this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
110 points (97.4% liked)
Games
32564 readers
2068 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At this point I think our best option may be a spiritual successor by a different, but passionate, dev team. Not that Rockstar couldn't knock it out of the park, its just that it feels like Rockstar is interested in proven money makers than doing anything real different.
As an initial fan of Red Dead Online, I couldn’t agree more. They’re too drunk on shark card cash to care. It was a good run.
can major corporations still justify releasing single player games without loot? Bully just wouldn't work as a subscription.
If it makes money, then it works. Not everything has to milk us dry.
Tell that to the capitalists in charge.
Making money isnt the goal, making more is.
They want GTA Online for everything, thas why RDR died off so quick. It couldnt be milked.
Living up to their name, then? (see: Mick Jagger, fuckin' Elvis, Jackov White, whatever Green Day's names are, etc.)