Movies and TV Shows

1 readers

2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!

Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)

Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

admin@lemmy.film

164

Ridley Scott Has a ‘Fantastic’ Cut of ‘Napoleon’ That Runs Four-and-a-Half Hours and Features Way More Joséphine (variety.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Bloodyashes@lemm.ee to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why not make it two separate parts, released fairly close together, like a month apart? You'd build up hype and make people want to see the first one before part two comes out, then offer some double feature screenings alongside the normal release to encourage viewings of the second one. It would then also gain a surge in ticket sales as people finally went to see part onento get caught up.

Effectively it would mean a single film taking up twice as many screens and pulling in twice as many tickets.

All of that's assuming it's any good, of course. But I would think by this point with Ridley Scott that's a decent bet.