this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
545 points (98.1% liked)

Work Reform

10011 readers
265 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/dHH7a

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 116 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

It may seem counterproductive for recruiters to advertise ghost jobs, theoretically wasting their own time as well as that of applicants—but there are incentives for doing so. About 38% say they post fake positions to maintain a presence on job boards when they aren’t hiring, 36% do so to assess the effectiveness of their job descriptions, 26% want to build a talent pool for the future, 26% hope gain insight into the job market and competitors, and 25% want to assess how difficult it would be to replace certain employees, according to the report. Escalera points out that a big reason for posting these jobs is recruiters wanting to improve their business’ image—nearly a quarter also say that fake jobs help their companies look as if they aren’t experiencing a hiring freeze, and one fifth say they post ghost jobs to improve the reputation of their company.

Way to validate our feelings about you, recruiters.

Edit: I'd like to see legislation that goes after "truth in advertising" in this area. This should be illegal. It wastes peoples' time.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 months ago

They're independent stats. You can both assess the effectiveness of your job descriptions and see how difficult it would be to replace certain employees.

load more comments (4 replies)