this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
436 points (98.0% liked)

News

23268 readers
4650 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Masked police officers in Romania carried out fresh raids early Wednesday at the home of divisive internet influencer Andrew Tate, who is awaiting trial on charges of human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.

Romania’s anti-organized crime agency, DIICOT, said it was searching four homes in the counties of Bucharest and nearby Ilfov, investigating allegations of human trafficking, the trafficking of minors, sexual intercourse with a minor, influencing statements and money laundering. The agency added that hearings will later be held at its headquarters. 

Tate’s spokesperson, Mateea Petrescu, said in response to the raids that “although the charges in the search warrant are not yet fully clarified, they include suspicions of human trafficking and money laundering” and added that his legal team is present. Petrescu did not address the allegations involving minors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Sounds like he's still stuck in the 90s. The police used to be corrupt as all hell, but things have slowly improved. Most would probably take a kickback for something very minor, like drinking a beer in a park, but there's too many eyes on them for anything more major.

Just 2 months ago a guy I know came in from Italy, but didn't realize Romania has a zero tolerance policy on drunk driving. He had a single glass of wine and was driving. Police stopped him, asked if he'd been drinking, he said yes. Once he realized how much shit he was in, he tried to bribe them. They added that to the charges. He's now banned from driving in Romania (he had to get a pair of friends from Italy to come pick up his car), but they were nice enough to not cancel his driving license completely.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cries in north america where drivers can collect DUIs as if they are trying to get a high score.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When I was 19 or 20, I got caught driving without insurance (don't do this) and my license was suspended for six months. Maybe two years later, my friend got pulled over on a DUI. He spent maybe an hour in jail before his parents bailed him out and got his license suspended for six weeks.

Like I said, don't drive without insurance, but I think I was a hell of a lot less likely to kill someone with my car than he was.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's obscene the revoke a license for insurance. I can understand a fine, maybe impounding the uninsured vehicle until you have proof of insurance.... But suspending the license? That's fucked.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I don't disagree with you. And six months was ridiculously excessive.

Of course, I had to go to work, and the bus didn't even remotely come close to my job, so I drove anyway. I didn't have a choice. I just hoped I didn't get pulled over again, which I thankfully did not.

[–] girthero@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It's obscene the revoke a license for insurance

But think of the shareholders!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Romania has a zero tolerance policy on drunk driving

Like blood alcohol limit is 0.00? Because most countries define a limit that makes you drunk and it ain't zero.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yup, exactly. Strictly 0.0. There are cases where people have lost their licenses after having one of those little chocolates with the rum-flavored fillings. This was a reaction to a huge wave of deaths due to DUIs.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's a bit rough. Bread that rises due to the action of yeast contains as much as 1.9% alcohol by volume.

Additionally, the yeast used in bread and cakes contains a residual amount of alcohol. It is impossible to remove the alcohol in the baking process. Therefore eating cakes and bread can set off the breathalyzer by a small percentage.

I'm all for clamping down on drunk driving. But I'm not for making it illegal to drive after eating a sandwich.

 

Edit: the exhaled air alcohol content is higher, at 0.4mg / l. I assume that's been calibrated to avoid false positives from eating bread.

Traffic police has right to stop and vehicle and test the driver regarding drugs and alcohol consumption. The alcohol limit allowed is 0.00mg/l, if the driver has alcohol content under 0.4mg / l of pure alcohol in the exhaled air, he will be fined, if the alcohol level is higher than 0,40mg/l (0.80g / l of pure alcohol in blood) is punishable by imprisonment to 1 to 5 years.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They're far from the only country to do this. Japan is the same way. Driving after even a drop of alcohol is illegal. It's technically even illegal to operate a bicycle with any alcohol in you.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Huh. So how do they pull over people that had those rum filled candies?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

If they get into an accident, or it's a spot check, or something like that they get breathalized.