this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
332 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
2850 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] no_im_doesnt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think we're all owed a refund and a penalty. What an insult to the original film...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I really don't know why they made it. If it had been an actual sequel to the original that in some way carried on the story that would have been okay.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait. It's not a sequel? Then what is it, other than a steaming pile of offal?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

The only allusion to it being a sequel is the bin full of drones from the original. That's as close to the original cast as it gets.

They couldn't even be arsed to Ghostbusters it up by getting the old crew to show the youngsters how it's done.

You can guess the ending about ten seconds in, and the ending is actually worse than that.

Plus I really don't like Glen Powell. The man looks designed by committee by Hollywood to normalise age gap relationships. He gives me the fucking creeps.

[–] Sniatch@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I watched the original and it was so bad. How can the new movie be an insult? Can it get worse?