Technology

59427 readers

3782 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1595

Some basic info about USB (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by SouravSatvaya@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

272 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I didn't really have an issue with USB type A ports. They worked fine, and it was only a minor inconvenience to orient them the right way. I cared far more about capabilities of the port (speed, power delivery, etc) than I did about the actual port.

That said, micro-USB sucks in every way. The awkward "is this the right way?" thing is way worse than with USB-A, it's not meaningfully smaller than mini-USB, the port is incredibly hard to clean (and it always gets dirty), and the connector seems to break all the time. I would've been totally fine with moving everything to mini-USB instead. The connector was less flimsy without being that much bigger, and it had room for more wires.

I do like USB-C though, I'm just not sure the added complexity is worth it.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly, I didn’t really have an issue with USB type A ports. They worked fine, and it was only a minor inconvenience to orient them the right way. I cared far more about capabilities of the port (speed, power delivery, etc) than I did about the actual port.

I believe that the reason that the smaller USB variants showed up was because some devices were just too small to physically accommodate a USB-A plug. Think MP3 players and later -- very importantly -- smartphones.

For the vast majority of consumer electronics, USB-A is fine. But for things that are as thin as possible, usually to fit into a pocket, it starts to bump up against limits.

That said, micro-USB sucks in every way. The awkward “is this the right way?” thing is way worse than with USB-A, it’s not meaningfully smaller than mini-USB, the port is incredibly hard to clean (and it always gets dirty), and the connector seems to break all the time. I would’ve been totally fine with moving everything to mini-USB instead.

Mini-USB put the tensioners -- the bit that wears out over time, is the bottleneck on the lifetime of the thing -- on the (expensive) device rather than the (cheap) cable. Micro-USB and USB-C didn't make that mistake.

Like, I think that there was a legitimate reason to fix that one way or another.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

MP3 players and later

Sure, and I had a handful that used mini-USB instead of micro-USB, and they were completely fine. It's easy to quickly look at the plug and orient it the right way, whereas with micro-USB, it's a fair bit harder.

I don't think I ever had a mini-USB device wear out the port. Then again, I didn't have a ton of them, so maybe it's more common.

Regardless, USB-C feels like an over-engineered solution to a few small problems. The ability to use it in any orientation is nice I guess, but I still have similar problems that I had w/ micro-USB, with cables wearing out over time. I'd rather we optimize for easier to swap ports (i.e. something like the Framework laptop's changeable ports).