tal

joined 2 years ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 11 hours ago

searches Tineye

https://www.deviantart.com/fu-reiji/art/get-on-all-fours-bitch-586490896

...has a reference to "Shido".

Searches for "shido" and "dog girl".

This video looks like it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5A68WEdTNbQ

Based on that, and the 2015 dates that Tineye finds for this image, it looks like it's from the 2013 anime TV series based on the Date A Live manga.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

End-to-end encryption for DMs

I mean, you can use GPG.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Britannica's print edition bit the dust in 2010:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica

The Encyclopædia Britannica (Latin for 'British Encyclopaedia') is a general-knowledge English-language encyclopaedia. It has been published since 1768, and after several ownership changes is currently owned by Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. The 2010 version of the 15th edition, which spans 32 volumes and 32,640 pages, was the last printed edition.[1] Since 2016, it has been published exclusively as an online encyclopaedia at the website Britannica.com.

Printed for 245 years, the Britannica was the longest-running in-print encyclopaedia in the English language.

...but the World Book Encyclopedia is still doing printed editions:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Book_Encyclopedia

The World Book Encyclopedia is an American encyclopedia.[1] World Book was first published in 1917. Since 1925, a new edition of the encyclopedia has been published annually.[1] Although published online in digital form for a number of years, World Book is currently the only American encyclopedia which also still provides a print edition.[2] The encyclopedia is designed to cover major areas of knowledge uniformly, but it shows particular strength in scientific, technical, historical and medical subjects.[3]

World Book, Inc. is based in Chicago, Illinois.[1] According to the company, the latest edition, World Book Encyclopedia 2024, contains more than 14,000 pages distributed along 22 volumes and also contains over 25,000 photographs.[4]

I have to admit that I've never bought a print copy of the World Book myself, though I did grow up with one.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tokyo and London are confirmed as the company’s first international markets

Apparently their software is capable of driving on the left.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

they don’t do any first-hand investigation of basic info that is clearly shared or copied from other USG agencies.

Specifically the World Factbook people probably don't, but I'm sure that least some of the estimates will come from the CIA, because they're going to be the ones who are going to be responsible for same.

But what I'm saying is that they aren't going to be closing the analysis guys down, just the public publication of that information. And the analysis part is going to be the bulk of the budget.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The thing is that it's a reference work; a major part of the value is that it's current. Old versions are going to decline in usefulness.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The White House has moved to cut staffing at the CIA and the National Security Agency early in Trump’s second term, forcing the agency to do more with less.

Dammit, I liked using the World Factbook.

I seriously doubt that they're saving all that much money. They have to gather the data anyway for CIA use; this just meant that the public got to benefit from some of it too.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't know if "GPUs" is the right term, but the only area where we're seeing large gains in computational capacity now is in parallel compute, so I'd imagine that if Intel intends to be doing high performance computation stuff moving forward, they probably want to be doing parallel compute too.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Amazon’s Fallout countdown delivers possibly the only thing more pointless than a New Vegas or Fallout 3 remaster

I'd buy a remaster.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There was something of a to-do a couple years ago when some researchers were trying to see how strong encryption satellites were using and whether they could break it and discovered that a number of of satellite operators weren't bothering to encrypt things at all.

EDIT:

This might be more recent than that:

https://www.kratosspace.com/constellations/articles/the-state-of-satellite-encryption

A new study from the University of California San Diego (UCSD) and the University of Maryland has performed the most comprehensive public exploration into geostationary (GEO) satellite security yet, logging large amounts of unencrypted data being broadcast across 411 transponders on 39 GEO satellites, which were intercepted with a simple commercial-off-the-shelf satellite dish costing a few hundred dollars.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

The problem with kinetic kill anti-satellite weapons is that they create debris clouds. Unless the satellite is at a low altitude and about to de-orbit, that's generally bad.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_debris_producing_events

Top debris creation events, August 2024

#1: Fengyun-1C 2007 3,549 fragments Intentional collision (ASAT)

EDIT: And apparently that debris cloud from that anti-satellite weapon test is believed to have taken out a Russian satellite:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_anti-satellite_missile_test

In early 2013, the Russian concept satellite BLITS collided with what is believed to be a piece of debris from Fengyun-1C, was knocked out of its orbit and soon afterwards data retrieval from the satellite ceased.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

The official expressed concern that sensitive information — notably command data for European satellites — is unencrypted, because many were launched years ago without advanced onboard computers or encryption capabilities.

According to the article the satellites that were shadowed were:

Satellite Launch date
RASCOM-QAF1R August 4, 2010
Eutelsat 3B July 2014
Eutelsat Konnect VHTS September 7, 2022
Astra 4A November 18, 2007
SES-5 July 9, 2012
Eutelsat KA-SAT 9A December 26, 2010
Eutelsat 9B January 30, 2016
Eutelsat 3C February 12, 2009

That wasn't that long ago relative to encryption being done on computers.

 

Starlink updated its Global Privacy Policy on January 15, according to the Starlink website. The policy includes new details stating that unless a user opts out, Starlink data may be used “to train our machine learning or artificial intelligence models” and could be shared with the company’s service providers and “third-party collaborators,” without providing further details.

 

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/24313827

Seriously, what the fuck is going on with fabs right now?

Micron has found a way to add new DRAM manufacturing capacity in a hurry by acquiring a chipmaking campus from Taiwanese outfit Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC).

The two companies announced the deal last weekend. Micron’s version of events says it’s signed a letter of intent to acquire Powerchip’s entire P5 site in Tongluo, Taiwan, for total cash consideration of US$1.8 billion.

140
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by tal@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
 

I think that it's interesting to look back at calls that were wrong to try to help improve future ones.

Maybe it was a tech company that you thought wouldn't make it and did well or vice versa. Maybe a technology you thought had promise and didn't pan out. Maybe a project that you thought would become the future but didn't or one that you thought was going to be the next big thing and went under.

Four from me:

  • My first experience with the World Wide Web was on an rather unstable version of lynx on a terminal. I was pretty unimpressed. Compared to gopher clients of the time, it was harder to read, the VAX/VMS build I was using crashed frequently, and was harder to navigate around. I wasn't convinced that it was going to go anywhere. The Web has obviously done rather well since then.

  • In the late 1990s, Apple was in a pretty dire state, and a number of people, including myself, didn't think that they likely had much of a future. Apple turned things around and became the largest company in the world by market capitalization for some time, and remains quite healthy.

  • When I first ran into it, I was skeptical that Wikipedia would manage to stave off spam and parties with an agenda sufficiently to remain useful as it became larger. I think that it's safe to say that Wikipedia has been a great success.

  • After YouTube throttled per-stream download speeds, rendering youtube-dl much less useful, the yt-dlp project came to the fore, which worked around this with parallel downloads. I thought that it was very likely that YouTube wouldn't tolerate this


it seems to me to have all the drawbacks of youtube-dl from their standpoint, plus maybe more, and shouldn't be too hard to detect. But at least so far, they haven't throttled or blocked it.

Anyone else have some of their own that they'd like to share?

 

I'm not sure whether this is an Mbin or Lemmy bug, but it looks like there's some sort of breakage involving their interaction.

A user on an Mbin home instance (fedia.io) submitted a post to a community on a Lemmy instance (beehaw.org).

https://beehaw.org/post/23981271

When viewed via the Web UI on Lemmy instances (at least all the ones, I tried, lemmy.today, lemmy.ml, and beehaw.org), as well as at least Eternity on lemmy.today this post is a link to an image, possibly proxied via pict-rs if the instance does such proxying:

https://fedia.io/media/93/77/937761715da35c5c9fb1267e65b4ea54c2b649c2eebbf8ce26d2b4cba20097bf.jpg

https://beehaw.org/post/23981271

https://lemmy.ml/post/41016280

https://lemmy.today/post/44629301

It contains no link to the URL that the submitter intended to link to.

When viewed via the PiedFed Web UI (checking using olio.cafe) or, based on what I believe to be the case from other responses, the Mbin Web UI, the post apparently links to the intended URL in a link beneath the title:

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/chatgpt-could-prioritize-sponsored-content-as-part-of-ad-strategy-sponsored-content-could-allegedly-be-given-preferential-treatment-in-llms-responses-openai-to-use-chat-data-to-deliver-highly-personalized-results

https://olio.cafe/c/technology/p/78253/chatgpt-could-prioritize-sponsored-content-as-part-of-ad-strategy-sponsored-content-could-a

Just wanted to make the devs aware of the interaction.

view more: next ›