this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
446 points (87.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21273 readers
576 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    446
    I like both, but usually prefer Ubuntu (slrpnk.net)
    submitted 2 months ago by tsugu@slrpnk.net to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    168 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Ubuntu had (I don't know if it still has) an additional contrib section in the sources.list for binary packages from "partners" without source code available, like e.g. Spotify.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    So does Debian

    [–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Sorry, I mixed that up. It was named Canonical partner or something like that and contained only binary packages. Debian contrib are free packages with dependencies in non-free. While non-free are packages with not DFSG compliant source code (but with source code).

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    That is not correct. Nonfree has software that is proprietary but jot firmware. Nonfree-firmware has the proprietary firmware.

    [–] Successful_Try543@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Yes, since Bookworm, there is also non-free-firmware which before was located in non-free. I've skipped that for simplicity, as both follow the same rules and non-free-firmware was introduced basically for convenience.

    Do you know if either of the non-free repos contain binary files without having the source available?

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    They do

    [–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    OK, TY. I've thought, there were just downloader packages, containing scripts to download the firmware binary from the device manufacturer and install it on the system, like e.g. the one for the Broadcom wireless driver.

    [–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

    That would be contrib - free software that downloads or relies on non-free software. non-free and non-free-firmware just contain straight up non-free (but redistributable) binaries.