this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
305 points (99.4% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3229 readers
124 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Postal Service’s new delivery vehicles aren’t going to win a beauty contest. They’re tall and ungainly. The windshields are vast. Their hoods resemble a duck bill. Their bumpers are enormous.

“You can tell that (the designers) didn’t have appearance in mind,” postal worker Avis Stonum said.

Odd appearance aside, the first handful of Next Generation Delivery Vehicles that rolled onto postal routes in August in Athens are getting rave reviews from letter carriers accustomed to cantankerous older vehicles that lack modern safety features and are prone to breaking down — and even catching fire.

Within a few years of the initial rollout, the fleet will have expanded to 60,000, most of them electric models, serving as the Postal Service’s primary delivery truck from Maine to Hawaii.

Once fully deployed, they’ll represent one of the most visible signs of the agency’s 10-year, $40 billion transformation led by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who’s also renovating aging facilities, overhauling the processing and transportation network, and instituting other changes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (19 children)
[–] Steve 7 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Ugly in an iconic way.
Clearly designed for practicality.
They look great to drive with all that visibility.

On the other hand the electric version just looks like a disappointing van.

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I thought the electric version looked exactly the same

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good use of angled armor on the front glacis, so you don't have to show the side of your hull to effectively bounce incoming shells.

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I understood that reference.

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

I see they chose to keep the 1970s style 5mph bumpers.

[–] Steve 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh! That's better.
One of the images had a van looking one, the caption said was the electric.

I thinks it's the back one in your image.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I was ready to say no, that's just Ford Transit but couldn't find conclusive evidence to confirm the minute body lines match a Ford and not a Mercedes Sprinter (my local variant). I went for one last attempt and searched "ford transit usps" and what do you know, we're both right to some degree. The back vehicle is an electric Ford Transit and the USPS has ordered over 9,000 units. It's not the "electric version" but rather a competitor to the Oshkosh lineup, which is the front truck. The Oshkosh NGDV is available as both gas and battery-electric.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)