Nougat

Have you met SCOTUS?

You complete me.

If they can't get that simple distinction correct, what does that say about the rest of their reporting?

Different federal circuits have ruled in different ways on these matters. Considering the current SCOTUS' "interesting" interpretation of concepts like bodily integrity and immunity, I stand by my statement that constitutional rights and protections for non-citizens within the US is not a settled matter of law.

Being able to stand up inside the vehicle is another huge benefit. And a bunch of them are going to be electric.

Was that the original title? Because that's not a revolver.

Edit: Ah the latter part is the subtitle, and it does say "revolver." Good job, "journalist."

I haven't been out of my basement in a while, you might be upstairs right now.

My wife would say, “Did you look?”

What ads?

Any of the rest of us …

I think you have answered your own question.

I skipped a grade.

Social psychological theories suggest two necessary conditions for people to feel included. First, they need to simply belong to the larger group — as ~~white people, men and Christians~~ racists in U.S. society do. Second, they need to feel that their ~~unique~~ racist backgrounds are respected and appreciated within the larger group. Hence, people may feel excluded from a group when they feel unseen or disrespected for their racist backgrounds even if they belong to the group.