this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
703 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

48208 readers
1263 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 375 points 2 months ago (120 children)

How is "someone called" enough evidence to enter peoples homes and arrest them?
These officers should lose their job,

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 105 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Well, I guess if someone calls and says you have kidnapped a little girl and that they have seen you with a gun, the police can't take a chance that it's hoax. All phone numbers that call the police should be logged and if it turns out to be a hoax, traced, so people who make hoax calls can be arrested and prosecuted.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If they enter his home, and there is no evidence of a crime, then what is the basis for the arrest?
One thing is to investigate the truth of a call, another is to act on it as if it's verbatim truth.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 70 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Usually swat teams break a lot of your shit, maybe kill a baby, and then leave without arresting you.

Don’t need to arrest the suspect if they’re dead taps forehead

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago

Oh AND leave you with the bill

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or toss a flash bang in the crib.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 13 points 2 months ago

After breaking down the wrong door

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Was he arrested? I don't see follow up. It only says he was handcuffed which would be standard until they know what's going on.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In the US, the cops need RAS to handcuff you. The standard was never and is not "until they know what's going on". And RAS depends on the current cop knowledge. Even if they had legal grounds to break into your place, what they see in the next ten seconds is still relevant. For example, if someone said you attacked them with a knife, when the cops see no victim, knife, or blood, their legal authority ceases.

Of course it's all highly dependent on specific details.

(On traffic stops, often they already have RAS. That's why they pulled you over. So don't be fooled by other comments about that topic.)

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

"Law enforcement officers typically have fairly broad leeway to place someone in handcuffs during an interaction if they believe that it’s necessary to protect themselves from harm. In those cases, they can do so even if the person being handcuffed hasn’t been arrested."

"When a search warrant is being executed"

https://www.northernillinoislegalteam.com/blog/2021/04/when-do-police-have-the-right-to-handcuff-a-person/

Handcuffs do not mean an arrest.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

This is in Germany, idk what laws in the US have to do with this

[–] freewheel@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not technically an arrest. In a high-stakes call, the police will typically detain everybody until they can figure out what's going on. That means potential victims as well as potential attackers. It's a safety measure.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

In the US, the 4th Amendment says that's unconstitutional. Fortunately. Too many dirty pigs out there.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There was no arrest.

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 2 months ago

They are logged, but swatting people get around it. They are suspicious “looking” calls, but so are bomb threats.

Swatting is pretty much always a blocked number to a non-emergency line. If they are traced it is typically one of those free online voip services. It takes work and access to really get from A to B, which is why it only happens when there are awful results.

In the US at least, 911 gets special access and calling it will always get you to your local dispatch (unless you have voip with the wrong account address). Non-emergency is just a normal phone number. If someone wants to call from out of the area or hide their number, non-emergency is how they have to do it. This is suspicious because in a real situation like “I just shot my dad” or whatever they say, nobody is taking time to look up non-emergency.

load more comments (117 replies)