this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
780 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21211 readers
110 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    780
    apt install firefox (sh.itjust.works)
    submitted 1 month ago by 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Also, Snap is proprietary. That alone is reason enough for me to steer clear.

    [–] Penta@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Well snap itself isn't proprietary, the backend server distributing the snaps is.

    [–] frazorth@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    Explain how this distinction matters in the real world?

    Snap distribution is as much a part of snaps as Snapd.

    Who cares that part of it is open source if other parts aren't?

    [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

    If Canonical folded Snap could be taken over by others who could build new server software for it, either from scratch or based off the other projects to develop alternative servers for it, and modify snap to accept multiple repos like that. That's the difference, also just being able to fork snap like that. Though the fact it hasn't been done says something about how many real snap enthusiasts there actually are.

    [–] frazorth@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    If Canonical folded, someone else could come along and reinvent everything on the server side. And that makes it Open Source?

    [–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    What makes it open source is the fact that the parts which matter most are open source. The part that installs on the system is open source, and because of that it can be more easily tweaked and modified to accept other servers. In actuality it can be modified to do so right now, it's just that there is little reason to do so because the amount of people enthusiastic about snap isn't very large, as it has many other problems besides just the centralized server infra.