this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
780 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21192 readers
378 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 131 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I don't have a problem with snaps as a technology. If you want to use them, then who am I to judge?

    But what I do have a problem with is when I don't have a choice and I am being forced to use what the distro maintainers think is good for me. That is what finally made me quit Ubuntu and switch to Fedora.

    [–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Also, Snap is proprietary. That alone is reason enough for me to steer clear.

    [–] Penta@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Well snap itself isn't proprietary, the backend server distributing the snaps is.

    [–] frazorth@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Explain how this distinction matters in the real world?

    Snap distribution is as much a part of snaps as Snapd.

    Who cares that part of it is open source if other parts aren't?

    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

    I do have a problem with them, the same problem was solved, better, with other technologies like appImage (which doesn't litter your mount list with 100 meaningless entries).

    Even flatpak is better, snap is an also ran they're trying to force on us without being as good as any of the competitors.

    [–] lengau@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Couldn't the same argument be made for any distro? They give you what they put in their repos. If you want a deb package, use the mozillateam PPA (which is built on Canonical's hardware, same as Mozilla's snap of it).

    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] superkret@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    when I don’t have a choice and I am being forced to use what the distro maintainers think is good for me.

    That's the case on literally any distro.
    And just like on literally any distro, you can also install Firefox from FlatPak, the Mozilla repo or from source.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Except on Ubuntu it just installs the snap regardless. If you don't pay attention you may not even realize that it is a snap. Also the snap store is controlled exclusively by one company with a questionable history.

    [–] superkret@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

    Read my comment again:

    install Firefox from FlatPak
    the Mozilla repo
    or from source

    In none of these cases will Ubuntu be able to install it from snap instead.
    Only the Firefox "package" in the Ubuntu repos actually just links to a script that installs the snap.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 59 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    This is why I switched from Ubuntu to Debian.

    [–] limelight79@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago

    Same here. What especially irritated me was that even though I installed the .deb firefox and followed the directions to disable snap firefox, occasionally Ubuntu went ahead and reinstalled snap firefox for me.

    [–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Ubuntu was great, until Unity debacle, when I switched to Mint DE. Few years later I returned to an Unity free Ubuntu just to be welcomed with snaps and Ubuntu pro.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    For me it was when I was trying to use some Android tools and it tried to install the snap version. The snap version was broken of course.

    [–] dditty@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    When I first returned to Linux several years ago I started with Ubuntu, since it was the only distro I had used. I got confused when I installed Firefox and other apps via apt but instead got snap versions. This (very miniscule) gripe is enough of a reason for me to not recommend Ubuntu to new users anymore.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] originaltnavn@lemm.ee 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    This is literally the reason why I switched over to Debian. At least back then, snaps wouldn't work if the home folders were not under /home/, breaking all computers on the system I helped run.

    [–] dan@upvote.au 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    At least back then, snaps wouldn't work if the home folders were not under /home/,

    Do you mean that it literally had /home/ hard-coded instead of using $HOME? That's crazy if so.

    [–] lengau@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    You can't use environment variables to set up apparmor rules.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

    Installed ubuntu on an rpi and firefox there ran snap. Was not very usable. Everything was so slow. Forcing an install of the dep package was the only way to use it. Not very well thought through bu cannonical.

    [–] superkret@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    8.10 was the last good Ubuntu. (It also had the best default wallpaper ever)

    If you look at the "improvements" in every release since, you'll notice that shit like they do currently isn't an accident:

    9.04 integrated web services into the main user interface.
    9.10 integrated Ubuntu One (Ubuntu's OneDrive, upgradable for money) by default and introduced the slooooow Ubuntu Software Center
    10.04 integrated an interface to post on social media
    10.10 added app purchases in the Software Center
    11.04 made Unity the default
    11.10 removed Gnome as fallback to Unity
    12.04 introduced the buggy HUD
    12.10 added the famous Amazon ad lense to it by default

    and it goes on like this...

    [–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

    Looks like a NiN album cover.

    [–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Trisquel GNU/Linux, is Ubuntu with all the non-free packages removed. Don't see any of that stuff.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] President@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (21 children)

    Wait... I'm just about to switch over to Linux on a laptop and was going to use Ubuntu. This looks kind of cursed though?

    [–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Tbf, Unbuntu works, but they're ran by a company which has made some questionable choices. You can still go with it if you don't care too much, it has the advantages of being user friendly and well documented.

    If you'd rather not, but you want something not too far and equally easy, you can go with Linux Mint, which is based on Ubuntu but disables snaps. They also offer differently choices of desktop environments, the default being Cinnamon (which looks a bit more like windows), and another being Mate, which is closer to Gnome.

    They also have a "Debian Edition", which aims to stop being dependant on Ubuntu and may or may not replace the default edition someday, but so far it's not the one they recommend for new users.

    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Switching to Ubuntu is way, way better than staying on Windows.

    That being said, Ubuntu is maintained by the Canonical company, and they have made some really sus decisions in the past. Things like putting Amazon ads in the application launcher and then trying to gaslight people when the inevitable backlash arrived.

    The meme above refers to Canonical's own Snap packaging format (think of it like UWP/Microsoft Store apps vs. "regular" Win32 apps), and the way they're pushing for its adoption. Snap is installed by default on Ubuntu and official Ubuntu flavors. You can uninstall it manually, but Canonical has modified the APT package manager so that when an application is available as a Snap package, it automatically installs the Snap back-end and the application as a Snap package without notifying the user (instead of installing the .deb-packaged applications, which is what happens on all other distributions that use APT). Canonical recently also ordered that official Ubuntu flavors (which are maintained by independent groups) can't include Flatpak, a universal packaging format that directly competes with Snap, in their default installations.

    [–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    You could try out Linux Mint¹, they're Ubuntu based and disable Snap by default².

    1. https://linuxmint.com
    2. https://linuxmint-user-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/snap.html
    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Linux mint has no GNOME or KDE variant, so while they fix many Ubuntu issues, they are still on XOrg.

    [–] rtxn@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    So? There's nothing preventing someone from installing either, and they're adding Wayland support to Cinnamon.

    load more comments (10 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

    It's not as bad as it looks, especially if you aren't hardcore, but for long-term linux users it's not great.

    Debian has become what Ubuntu wanted to be: An easy, clean distribution that basically just works, which is a major reversal.

    Also consider fedora.

    But don't be worried about Ubuntu, it's still completely usable.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

    Just install something else like Linux Mint or Pop OS. Ubuntu doesn't seem to want to respect your rights as a user. You do one thing and the sneakily do something else. Its a bit like how Microsoft makes Edge the default after an update.

    [–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 month ago

    Pick whatever looks best. It's not a big of a deal as we make it out to be.

    Fedora KDE is also an awesome choice though if you must choose something else.

    [–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

    Ubuntu's packet manager Apt was already kind of awful in many ways, especially with its PPA hell. But them adding Snap packages somehow managed to make them reach even new levels of awful.

    load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago

    Installs Thunderbird snap and the dialog crashes, on 12 identical upgrades

    [–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The nextcloud snap is the best and easiest way to selfhost nextcloud.

    I said it. Fight me.

    [–] ikidd@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The AIO docker compose container is far better, and I've run Nextcloud in pretty much every installation path in the last decade, using baremetal, my own docker, snap, NCPi, and VMs. All of them have had issues with updating, backup and the host going sideways for some reason or another. The AIO has been flawless for far longer than any of them managed.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    You are 👍, nextcloud needs like 2 admin per each user. The snap version works fairly well even after a lot of virtualization layers. Proxmox -> Ubuntu LXC -> Snap -> Nextcloud

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)
    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] vala@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    IMO the biggest issue with snaps in the sandboxing. Makes so many apps unusable for development.

    [–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Isn't that what "classic" confinement is supposed to solve?

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] bluewing@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

    Snap could have been great. Except it wasn't very good...........

    [–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] renzev@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

    One of my friends spent like a month distrohopping just to find a debian-based distro that fits these two criteria:

    • First-class support for KDE

    • Isn't broken all the time

    Ubuntu fails both. KDE Neon excels on the first one, but fails harder than ubuntu on the second one. Kubuntu as well. Debian has horridly outdated packages, and he refuses to use nix/flatpak. Tuxedo OS is obscure and broken. Mint is great, but installing KDE takes some effort.

    He finally settled on Ubuntu Server with the native KDE package. Still has to do some weird incantations to banish snap tho.

    How did things get this bad?

    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] Mwa@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

    Imagine flatpack did smth like this

    [–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I feel like I would be more okay with this is snap didn't still have a lot of very real flaws.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Mio@feddit.nu 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I am against container as they are slower to start and much bigger. I think they solve the problem the wrong way. Next step is probably a VM...

    Firefox have always been possible to run without container so what is the problem for all Linux distributions that containers solve? Nowadays developers have do to both... That did not less the load.

    [–] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

    I think they solve the problem the wrong way.

    My thoughts exactly 👍.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›