this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
38 points (85.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43858 readers
1711 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What alternative ways can you think of to handle making legislation and passing laws that would negate the increasingly polarized political climate that is happening in more and more countries?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Greatly expand congress (like at least 10x), and have it work like jury duty.

[โ€“] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Random cost less to buy than congress people.

[โ€“] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But you'd have to bribe a lot more to sway legislation, and nobody serves more than like a year or two so you can't "buy for life". Also, congress people are already shockingly cheap.

They will have lots of funds from all the savings on ads.
Anyway, I am starting to think random people secestered or something. Maybe it is only a couple of months at a time. They vote on some legislation, then work on new legislation for the next group to vote on.