Privacy

42132 readers

853 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

146

New York Police Will Use Drones To Monitor Backyard Parties This Weekend, Spurring Privacy Concerns (apnews.com)

submitted 2 years ago by shreddy_scientist@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What are they even looking for?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 years ago

I honestly don't know. Maybe they could equipt them with powerful microphones that can record the conversations of the people below. They would help with putting a stop to thought crime. The police could then use automated speech analysis to determine if you are comiting thought crime and activate the appropriate response.

Afyer the initial reponse they could remove the person and their friends and family from society. It would be a challenging task updating the records to show that these terrorists never existed. You would also need to make sure that the people around are aware that there own memories are wrong.

[–] EveryMuffinIsNowEncrypted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They don't have a specific objective, and that's the problem.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Political organizers

[–] elouboub@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you even read the article?

[–] cobra89@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“If a caller states there’s a large crowd, a large party in a backyard, we’re going to be utilizing our assets to go up and go check on the party,”

What does "check on" mean? It really doesn't say what they're looking for, just an arbitrary description of "large crowd".

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The party will just be aborted and stopped. Obviously..

[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago

Like, if there was a restrictions to how large a party can be (say in response to the current wave of COVID cases), this would make sense.

I disagree with this being a reasonable measure, but at least it would make sense as to why they want to do it, ya know?

As it is, it sounds like NYPD is just trying to use all their budget so they don't lose it next year or whatever.