Games

16746 readers

916 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

341

EA execs say generative AI is "not merely a buzzword for us, it's the very core of our business," then pretend to tell a computer to generate buildings live on stage (www.gamesradar.com)

submitted 1 month ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (15 children)

I know you're being sarcastic but if we actually look on the bright side, then tools like this could make indie games easier to produce. More and better indie games could in theory bring more competition to companies like EA and that could actually pressure them to make games cheaper.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That's how I look at AI. It will never (in it's current forms) replace people, but it can turn a passionate creator into a one person army

Using AI is a form of programming - you turn the right words into action. Programming is magic, an AI user is a warlock

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

As a programmer I can tell you that AI is nothing like programming because programming is deterministic and repeatable and AI is anything but.

[–] Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI is actually deterministic, a random input is usually included to let you get multiple outputs for generative tasks. And anyway, you could just save the "random" output when you get a good one.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe deterministic wasn't quite the correct word but basically it only gives you a result that resembles your previous result if you change absolutely nothing, not the training data for the model, not the model, not the random seed, not the prompt,... which makes it useless for iteratively approaching a usable result. I guess the output space is not contiguous might be a better way to describe it.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Right, technically deterministic, but not practically

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)