this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
24 points (59.4% liked)

Socialism

6245 readers
12 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Immediately thought of Vietnam and Cambodia. OP really doesn't know much history... [Edit: I just checked because I wasn't sure, but China didn't invade Cambodia as far as I can tell. I knew they invaded Vietnam in support of Cambodia, but I didn't know whether some of the Sino-Vietnamese battles also took place in Cambodia, and apparently, no.)]

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

And OP's comparison pic is nonsense for more reasons than that. The time ranges are wildly different, it's counting starting from 1776 for the US, but it starts counting from 1949 for the PRC

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

China is occupying Vietnam and Cambodia?

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Image says "Has invaded since PRC was founded", not "is occupying right now", don't try to change the terms of the debate when contradicted. You still could've made a point that China invaded much fewer countries than the US, but at least try to have an accurate map or the accurate words.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Portraying minor skirmishes as invasions is the height of dishonesty. Ironic that you would do that while accusing me of being inaccurate.

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I don't find it dishonest or inaccurate to say that crossing a border with troops and tanks and occupying cities constitutes an invasion, but I guess it's a matter of semantics. As is calling a conflict with dozens of thousands of casualties a "minor skirmish".