this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
24 points (59.4% liked)

Socialism

6230 readers
119 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I was just complaining about border skirmishes, then I'd mention India or something. The attack on Vietnam was more than just a "minor border skirmish".

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, feel free to explain how the attack on Vietnam constitutes an occupation. Are you suggesting China's military action was carried out with the intent of annexing a part of Vietnam?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Come on, you're more well-read than this. You know that military occupation and annexation are not the same thing.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still haven't answered what you think the intent of the military action was. Do you claim any military confrontation is occupation?

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd more say that the military occupation was done for the sake of confrontation (this is similar to the official Chinese line). It was a really senseless invasion, as far as I can tell (and I disagree with the Vietnamese line that the war was expansionist).

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think we can agree on that