this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
320 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

7202 readers
335 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MrFlagg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how does that not just increase rent?

[โ€“] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Property taxes of 100% for units not occupied by owners. Income taxes on rental of 110%.

Problem solved.

[โ€“] dekerta@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you have put any thought in to this. How would that solve anything exactly? If you taxed rental income at 110% then nobody would ever be a landlord, and all existing landlords would evict their tenants immediately, leaving millions homeless. Do you just want a system where you can only live in owned properties and renting is forbidden?

[โ€“] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Note also that I want to tax all non-resident properties at 100%. There'd be a lot of homes to go into.

[โ€“] MrFlagg@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well as long as you are admitting you are ok with state sponsored theft. Very Putin of you

[โ€“] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, is Putin the new insult from the libertarian crowd? I thought they were slobbering all over his knob. The winds change so quickly!