this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
320 points (98.2% liked)

Canada

7134 readers
247 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are so many great ideas that could have been implemented by now, and have been implemented in other countries. But the Liberals have only instituted policies to make it worse. Only now that the youth vote is leaving them they may at least pay lip service to it. It's honestly disgusting.

Only the greens have put forward anything that would help stem the investor class from depriving Canadians of a place to live.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Preach. I voted Green. Mike shows promise and he's consistent with messaging. Next election I'll more than happily stump for them.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Triple property taxes for units not occupied by owners. Quick fix.

[–] MrFlagg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how does that not just increase rent?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Property taxes of 100% for units not occupied by owners. Income taxes on rental of 110%.

Problem solved.

[–] dekerta@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think you have put any thought in to this. How would that solve anything exactly? If you taxed rental income at 110% then nobody would ever be a landlord, and all existing landlords would evict their tenants immediately, leaving millions homeless. Do you just want a system where you can only live in owned properties and renting is forbidden?

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Note also that I want to tax all non-resident properties at 100%. There'd be a lot of homes to go into.

[–] MrFlagg@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well as long as you are admitting you are ok with state sponsored theft. Very Putin of you

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, is Putin the new insult from the libertarian crowd? I thought they were slobbering all over his knob. The winds change so quickly!

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The issue is owners just fake the documents when your property tax or vacancy tax mail arrives. Friend of mine rents basement suite, landlord has not lived in main house for over two years, it has been empty the entire time. somebody comes every few weeks to collect mail.

[–] klisklas@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Then why not check on it occasionally and put a hefty fine on it when they fake the documents? If you cannot make a new and important law because rich people will try to bypass it than the state is useless.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

There definitetly should be a better method. An honour system by mailing and online affirmation of occupied unit is useless.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

You'd have to have someone go door-to-door at random intervals for an absolute check, I think, but that isn't a bad thing provided that the people doing it are paid a reasonable wage.

[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Whistleblower law that lets people who finger this kind of landlord take ownership of the property at a nominal fee for processing the paperwork. Call it $25.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We still don't physically have enough houses. It's quick, but not a fix.

[–] Overzeetop@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Forbid corporate ownership of anything under 4 units/12 bedrooms, and require them own 100% of any contiguous building over 4 units. Added taxes will just be passed on to residents. Corporations are used to aggregate money (both public corps and family/friend groups) and avoid taxes.

Then make a financial law that forbids making property loans with collateral which includes any real property that is not the property being purchased. No condo bros buying units and then re-fi-ing out to buy more.

[–] abogical@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Land value tax would fix this.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Georgism making a comeback baby!

[–] abogical@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope so. Subscribe to !georgism@kbin.social if you haven't already.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

how about prevent cooperate take over of nin commercial property, especially foreign takeover. Look at how they're swooping in on the victims in Hawaii after the fires.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

this would work. It would make things like the 2009 banking crisis more of a crisis but maybe thats not a bad thing.

the other thing is downward pressure needs to be applied to the market: new units sold at below market value to people that don't already own homes

[–] lilShalom@lemmy.basedcount.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The solution is to build more housing.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

That is part of the solution, the othee part is not letting a foreign owner buy a place and leave it vacant.

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So Basically, there's always going to be a crisis. Cool thanks.