this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
650 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (14 children)

You don't complain about having to open your door or start the engine when escaping a threat.

Having to unplug a cable during a very specific, imagined threat seems like a niche problem.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago (12 children)

The difference being that not being able to start the motor with the door open is only a problem if the driver was being attacked in a parking lot.

It's not too big of a leap to imagine a world where a person could immobilize a car at a red light with the plug cut off from a public charger. Wall up to a stopped car, open the hatch (maybe it needs a pry bar) and put the dummy plug in. Now the car is immobilized. Smash the driver side window and they're in business.

Sure, there are some safeguards that can be added like requiring a current to immobilize the vehicle, but it's far from the simplest or safest answer. Car manufacturers need to stop putting in hard limits and just use alarms instead. I bought a new Subaru that has collision detection standard. The hedge next to my driveway was overgrown, but I drove right through it. The car sounded an alarm and flashed a bunch of lights, but it didn't engage the brakes, I was able to blast through an obstacle that I knew was minor even though the car thought it was a threat. If a manufacturer feels compelled to add a safety system, it's possible to do so without taking control away from the driver.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It's not too big of a leap to imagine a world where a person could immobilize a car at a red light with the plug cut off from a public charger. Wall up to a stopped car, open the hatch (maybe it needs a pry bar) and put the dummy plug in.

Sounds like a lot of hassle. If they want to immoblise a self driving car they just stand in front of it.

Why carry a plug cut off from a public charger when you can just stab the tyres?

Use the pry bar to smash the window and open the door. Not open the charging port.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
  1. It's about hitting electric cars, self driving or otherwise.

  2. Cars can still move with punctured tires, at least far enough that a would-be robber or carjacker could get dragged a good distance.

  3. You smash the window and open the door. Now the panicked driver is speeding away, leaving you high and dry or dragging you along.

Being able to completely immobilize a vehicle while keeping it intact is a criminal's wet dream. It's incumbent on car manufacturers to consider that while implementing safety features.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Being able to completely immobilize a vehicle while keeping it intact is a criminal's wet dream.

It's been a reality for over a decade.

https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/

My point is that plugging in a charging cable is way down the list of attacker tools.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's on the list.

If it saves even one human life it's worth switching to an alarm instead of immobilization, even if that means hundreds of breakaway cables get snapped by morons driving away from chargers.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What if hundreds of lives are lost due to broken cables snapped by morons driving away from chargers?

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How the fuck do you think gas pumps work?

I'm done feeding the trolls.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Gas pumps are something you’re doing “right now”, so you ought to remember. Vs a charging cable s something you plugged in last night and left that way. Much easier to forget.

You’re very unlikely to change drivers at a gas pump so you probably won’t forget. Vs a charging cable is something your spouse may or may not have plugged in last night, and they’re not necessarily there to remember.

It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a gas pump with trigger lock. You have to be actively involved with pumping gas, holding it the whole time, so unlikely to forget

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So we are agreed. Immobilize vehicles both when they are charging and refuelling.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)