this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
92 points (98.9% liked)

Fediverse

17698 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
92
Threads: We've Seen This Before (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by confluence@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
26 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We really shouldn't take this Meta thing lightly.

They could offer the slickest interface and keep people locked to their friends. That interface can use protocols that make it difficult/impossible for non-Threads instances to play ball (ooh this cool new feature is only available through the Threads app; Oh, mybasement.world.ml.xyz can't read that content). There are many ways to Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish, we've seen Meta do it before (e.g. XMPP), and I'm sure we haven't even thought of some ways Threads could EEE.

I think defederation from Meta's instances is probably our only option to protect what we have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amiuhle@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They pledge to defederate from Meta, I'd go one step further and defederate from any instance that federates with Meta.

[–] tobias@social.diekershoff.de 1 points 1 year ago

@amiuhle this would be a block-list of ~25k entries at the moment, or just add those you want to federate with to the allow-list of your node. Nodes can certainly be run that way.

[–] supergrobi@mastodon.berlin 1 points 1 year ago

@amiuhle @tomasz

I don't understand all the excitement, did you per chance read this?
https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2023/07/what-to-know-about-threads/

load more comments (1 replies)