this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

Greentext

4397 readers
1475 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A 20 does not mean the spell achieves something out of its capabilities, what is this five year olds playing DnD?

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, as a DM, when this doesn’t infringe on other player’s fun like here I don’t mind doing extraordinary stuff for the Nat 20

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Taking away someone's intentional, roleplayed disability definitely falls under "infringing on someone's fun", though. If the player (not just the character) is also disabled and trying to represent themselves in the game, this goes beyond infringing on fun straight into lowkey offensive. I would never let this nat 20 work. Maybe it fixes the wheelchair or something.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Main issue is the wheelchair itself. No adventurer would ever use a wheelchair, the only reason we can use wheelchairs now are uniform roads and ada mandated ramps. Magic carpets exist and are cheap in game and don’t make you a liability.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, have you considered a dwarven wheelchair made from the shields of the fallen, using their frames for wheels that grant comparable protection while gaining grip compared with a wooden spoke?

Or a druidic wheelchair of entire roots that bonded to the druid when they were mortally wounded on the forest, bonding them permanently?

Or a warlock who walks with an artificial leg of miasma and lurching tentacles that his patron restored him to in exchange for his soul debt?

Literally no reason and no way a wheelchair in game is more a liability than some geriatric old fucking wozard breaking his hip or your characters having a concussion and needing an EMT.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
  1. Though better than the alternative it would still be terrible on any uphill.

  2. Roots bonding to the lower body would not form a wheelchair, more like darth maul spider legs.

  3. That’s a leg, not a wheelchair.

In every scenario, using any magic would circumvent the disability in a way that ends up mimicking walking while not being a liability.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Yes.

That is wheelchairs and prosthetics do my friend.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why do people think this? Like, I'm not mad at you, just amazed at how common this belief is.

Wheelchairs were around, and in use on surfaces that were abysmal in comparison to modern ones, but they worked.

Whether or not an adventurer would use one is a different issue, but folks really don't know shit about wheelchairs it seems.

I'm not saying it would be fun, or easy, but I've been out in the woods on paths barely wide enough to fit a chair, and had people, my patients, push themselves the entire way, lumps, ruts, rocks, roots and all. And rubber tires aren't magic for that. They help, but they don't make the impossible possible, just the edge cases easier.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Because this is a FANTASY WORLD with MAGIC and BETTER ALTERNATIVES.