this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
-4 points (0.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
3216 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol, we aren't scared at all about this nobody party we hear nothing about or from except at the last second in some desperate attempt to claw validity from thin air. We are annoyed we have to put up with this pointless BS that has literally zero chance of success and only serves to help the opposite agenda.

TBH I support their down ballot running everywhere they have a legit chance to win or even seriously impact the Overton window, but her dumb ass running for President at this pointless stage in the game has no chance in hell of either.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It's funny how a "nobody party" that supposedly poses no threat can stir up so much anger and frustration. The replies and responses to this article suggest that some folks might be more scared than they're willing to admit.

People don’t get this worked up over something they truly believe is irrelevant.

I’m not even voting for Stein—I’ve shifted my support to Rachele Fruit of the Socialist Workers Party, who aligns more closely with my socialist convictions. But I still support Stein’s fight to break the stranglehold the Democrats and Republicans have on this country.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s funny how a “nobody party” that supposedly poses no threat can stir up so much anger and frustration.

It isn't funny at all, and you know exactly why but tap dance around it in a blatantly obvious attempt to maintain credibility. It isn't the green party we care about at all. It's the threat their idiocy increase of a Trump presidency. Were approval voting the method, or electoral college abolished your constant bombardment of this parties every pitiful mention in the news would at worst be simply ignored.

But you know this as dozens of people have said this to you one way or another in your brief, pointless existence on here.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh lookee there, a “tap dance” accusation—yet another move to discredit those who dare challenge the two-headed snake of the duopoly. It’s amusing how those who claim to be so unbothered by a "nobody party" spend so much time and energy attacking it.

If the Green Party is as insignificant as you claim, then why the endless hand-wringing? Could it be that deep down, you’re just a bit worried that people might finally be waking up to the stranglehold your precious duopoly has on this so-called democracy?

But you know this as dozens of people have said this to you one way or another in your brief, pointless existence on here.

If my existence here is so "pointless," it’s curious how riled up you seem to be. And for the record, I’m not even voting for Jill Stein anymore, yet here you are, still fired up. Maybe it’s time to ask yourself why a "pointless" voice bothers you so much.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you honestly expect us to care who you 'claim' you're voting for? And thinking this is 'riled up' is just another example for others to see of your clear refusal to argue reasonably. Bonus points for continuing to tap-dance around the actual issue by complaining about tap-dancing accusations. Well done.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow, it’s almost amusing how desperate you are to protect the duopoly, lashing out with every trick in the book.

Ya know, the fact that you’re so focused on discrediting any challenge to this rotten system makes me wonder if you’re secretly working for Trump or something, trying to keep everyone in line while the two-headed snake continues to strangle the working class.

Your attempts to paint me as unreasonable only reveal how terrified you are of genuine change. Keep playing your game—I'm still not voting for your candidate. Whether you imply my claims are false or not, it won't change my stance.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alright, that was the third chance I magnanimously gave you to snap out of this loop of nonsense you seem to be stuck in. Have fun fighting a lost battle with whomever decides to entertain your futility at this point.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

If you’re that weary of me, blocking me is just a click away. Have a great day!

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they can never win, they can only make other people lose. that’s a pretty shitty raison d’être.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

I didn't write the article and I'm not voting for Stein. You'll have to bring that up with them.