this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
5292 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And with the issues intel had with their processors..

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does sound like most of that was not actually manufacturing, but design.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you're referring to the 13&14th Gen chips then yes, Intel is saying it's on the software side.

But if you're talking about 10th Gen chips that took forever to get out of the gate due to issues with sub 14nm lithography, then no it's a hardware issue. Intel has had issues over recent years with actual die shrinks.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Regardless, it feels like what we see with Boeing. A company culture that prioritized marketing and time to market over everything else consequences be damned.

Move fast and break stuff is probably not the best strategy if you are building airplanes or processors or other PhD level stuff... Or maybe it's just never a good strategy.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah nice fast and break things is a great way to maximize short term profits at the expense of the long term. But fuck it, I got mine in the short term, so it works.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Intel blew their RD spending on share buy bucks... Now we giving them money🤡

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That should never happen without equity. Controlling equity for the government.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Breach my man... But I got destroyed by the reddit normie brigade for such claims before.

They said that would make it communism... But giving rich clowns money is some how capitalism?

Their brain get broken in this 🐸

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's just very capitalistic.

Look you need money and/or protection, else you go bankrupt. We can provide these but there is a cost. And since you cannot refuse, we get to dictate terms... Our terms are "a controlling interest".

Alternatively we allow you to go bankrupt and then buy the bankrupt organisation for even less.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

If you’re referring to the 13&14th Gen chips then yes, Intel is saying it’s on the software side.

Yes, I was, but there was also some initial manufacturing issue with oxidation. That wasn't the bulk of the issues that they were running into, though.