this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1122 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5392 readers
226 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
1122
The value of x (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago by sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The internal angles of a triangle always add up to 180⁰, therefore the one pixel offset is irrelevant because the unlabelled angle is, despite what the image suggests, ~~60~~ 80⁰.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Assuming you're talking about the triangle on the left, it's 80⁰: 180 - 60 - 40 = 80. The other two unlabeled angles are 100⁰ and 45⁰ respectively. None of the unlabelled angles are 60⁰.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

The shape on the left might be a quadrilateral instead of a triangle, with a vertex at the same place as the top vertex of the shape on the right.

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes I meant 80 lol, thanks

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

It's enough to say it's "CLEARLY" not 90⁰.