politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
One of my least favorite things is people being aggressively defensive... before anyone's said a goddamn thing.
I've been posting here for a bit, and trust me friend, plenty has been said. So much so that the mods had to have a sidebar about me because so many people were aggressive and angry that I post third party articles. The mods here are awesome by the way, and agreed that I am not breaking the rules! Because this IS a community that discusses a diversity of politics.
But the personal attacks and insults are getting out of hand, hence my disclaimer when I post now.
Here's just few spirited comments to me from last couple of days:
mods having a special meeting to decide how to deal with you is not really a glowing endorsement.
The meeting was because you guys seem to lose your mind when I post, rather than just shrug and move on. And the meeting decided that I'm not doing anything wrong, so you guys just need to calm down a bit. Cuz I'm still posting and I'll continue to do so.
Again, if you have a problem with me, please feel free to block me so you don't have to see my posts anymore. Thank you!
Only a fool would include such a mild insult as justification for their persecution complex 😄
His comment calling me a fool got removed for civility because it is against this subs rules, so...
Still far too mild to bother anyone who's not oversensitive, whether mod or "victim".
You probably wouldn't even be censured for calling the Chair a fool during a Senate hearing, it's so mild!
If being called a fool is beyond the pale for you, maybe the internet is too rough and you should limit your conversation to safer spaces until you grow a much thicker skin 😄
OR people can try to make their points without calling anyone names, regardless of who they are voting for.
I've never called anyone names.
If these community rules are too hard for you to follow, maybe you should limit your conversation to more relaxed spaces until you figure out that people can actually disagree with someone without calling them names. Cool?
Whatever you say, Karen 🙄
Not my name, but thank you for following the community rules! :)
I don't understand how people aren't understanding how problematic it is to call you a "Fool". That's no way to communicate.
"Clown" is way more accurate.
Or, you could simply choose not to call anyone negative names at all. There's no need to resort to name-calling to make a point, no matter how mad you are that someone disagrees with you.
This would be more impactful if you weren't getting bent out of shape for being called foolish. That's about as respectful an insult a person can offer.
I didn't remove the comment because I am not a mod here, nor did I write the communities rules. If they agreed to remove it because it broke the rules, then that's something that we have to accept if we wanna stay in the community.
There are plenty of Lemmy communities that are uncivil, and you are free to go to those.
You really need to get over the fool comment being removed. Move on, friend. It's done.
Concern trolling... Not really helping your reputation bud.
Accusing someone of trolling is against this community's rules and spirit. Please refrain from personal attacks.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn't align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
Lemmy isn't very large and most of us recognize your username and notice the pattern to your posts.
I'm not accusing you of being a Russian asset or a bot here, but the people saying that have a point. You're constantly encouraging left-leaning voters in swing states to throw their votes away in November on hopeless third party spoilers, and then you sealion in the comments without ever clarifying your motivations.
We all see you and your agenda here. The reason people hate you is because you've earned it. If you're asking people not to vote for Kamala, you're carrying water for Trump, especially in swing states. Whatever your motivation, be you a paid Russian troll, or a right-wing agent provocateur posting in bad faith, or a helplessly optimistic lefty who thinks you can usher in a revolution through contrarian voting, we don't care, because so much is on the line if Trump wins none of us has any tolerance for anyone claiming to be an ally while providing material assistance to fascists.
no dude, you don’t get it, it was just an article that was posted on a larger site and so now it’s posted here somehow with 90 similar ones. He has no motivation or agenda or opinion at all really! Can’t we just discuss the articles?
Agreed! Because as you know, this is a political news sub and it's for ALL types of political news articles. Not just pro-Democrat ones. Right?
Anyone who doesn't like the fact that I post political news articles, can definitely block me or message the mods if they think the articles posted are inappropriate for this community. Thank you!
How so? Because I post articles about third parties? And the vast vast majority of my posts are the a socialist sub that I created and mod?
How am I "constantly encouraging" them? By posting news articles? I didn't write the articles. And I have posted third party libertarian news, and the theory that people are saying is that libertarians actually take votes away from republicans.
And what is my agenda?
Just because I am not voting for your candidate doesn't mean I have an agenda. Please see the disclaimer comment I posted when I posted the article. I don't write the news, I just post the articles, friend.
I support and respect your right to vote for who you wish. Just as I would think you support and respect my right to as well.
When have I asked people not to vote for Kamala?
In fact, if you recognize my username and pattern as you say you do, then you'll see multiple comments of me telling people that I support and respect their rights to vote for who they want. In fact, I'll start putting that in my disclaimer from now on too. Because you seem to be overlooking that fact.
How is posting a news article "encouraging people to not vote for Kamala"? Do you think people are so week that me posting an article is going to magically make them not vote for Kamala?!
Just because I personally am not voting for the corrupt two-party system doesn’t equate to supporting fascists — I'm personally just voting for the candidate that I think is pushing for real change and ending the status quo.
But I'm fine with people voting for who they want. And I have never asked anyone to vote the way I am. You don't seem particularly fine with the concept of people voting for who they want to, though.
It's a news article, friend. I didn't write it. If you feel the article is inaccurate, please reach out the the news org who wrote it and let them know if you don't think they should be publishing it.
I've just updated the statement I will post with every single article I post to this sub from now on. I have updated based on your misunderstanding. Please refrain from implying that I am encouraging people to vote for my candidate:
----To cut through the nonsense and save everyone time, especially since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to my posts recently: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.
I'm just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion. I am NOT saying that anyone has to vote any certain way.
I’m clarifying all of this due to past posters refusing to refrain from insults, as well as repeated baseless accusations that I’m a Republican, Russian, and/or that I'm not even an American citizen (sorry guys, I'm all American)
So I'd prefer we stick to discussing the article’s politics rather than focusing on me personally, if you'd like to engage with me. Now if you wanna just talk crap about me but not talk to me, then feel free. But I don't really think that fits in with the spirit of this awesome community.
I’m not here to prove anything to you. I’ll keep posting content that fits the community’s guidelines, and if you feel otherwise, the mods are available. Thank you! -----
Cool? From now on, let's stop with the personal attacks on me just because I posted an article you don't like. Let's try to stick to discussing the article. Thank you!
Oh and one from this very thread, in spite of my disclaimer: