this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
-4 points (0.0% liked)

politics

19101 readers
3593 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

MADISON, Wis. -- Four independent presidential candidates have filed signatures and paperwork to appear on the November ballot, the Wisconsin Elections Commission announced Tuesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

we have to fix FPTP later, not right fucking now.

That's been said every fucking election on the last 50 years. Variations of, "Oh no, we need change, but not THIS election. THIS election is too important!"

  1. Fucking. Years.

So guess what? No more waiting.

I'm voting for who I want to win, not because I am scared of who might win. Also, even though this article is about a socialist candidate, I'm personally voting Green Party this year.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You want to get rid of FPTP? Have 3rd parties actually win?

Ignore the presidential race completely. It's literally irrelevant to third parties and you are wasting your breath with a symbolic vote that isn't worth the paper it is printed on. I'm glad it'll make you feel better when the rabid fascists successfully suppress enough other progressive votes to win the rest of the election up and down ballot, and then oopsie you can't vote anymore teehee how'd that happen?

Start at the local level. Campaign for ranked choice voting at the county and state level. Get independents and progressives in at the lower city, county and state wide offices that actually DO have an impact on setting election policy and can build the groundwork that actually lets 3rd parties get a chance. All of this tunnel vision on the high profile presidential race has forever ruined every 3rd party's chance of even existing, because they absolutely refuse to put any kind of effort into the races that matter.

RCV is on the ballot in Oregon for November. I have high hopes it will pass, given our state's general electoral leaning. These kinds of movements have been brewing for all those years you are bitching and moaning about "ohhh but next year" but never get much traction due to hand-wringing about the national bullshit. So shut the hell up and MAKE IT HAPPEN LOCALLY, QUIT BITCHING ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE!

and with that in mind, maybe you should vote for the candidate most likely to support a change to RCV and actually win.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Start at the local level.

What makes you think I haven't. I totally stumped for my local green party. And the green party has won local elections: Californians have elected 55 of the 226 office-holding Greens nationwide. Other states with high numbers of Green elected officials include Pennsylvania (31), Wisconsin (23), Massachusetts (18) and Maine (17). Maine has the highest per capita number of Green elected officials in the country and the largest Green registration percentage with more than 29,273 Greens comprising 2.95% of the electorate as of November 2006.[68] Madison, Wisconsin is the city with the most Green elected officials (8), followed by Portland, Maine (7).

maybe you should vote for the candidate most likely to support a change

Oh, I am. I'm voting for Jill Stein as president this November. Proudly so. I have the shirt, the bumper stickers, I volunteer. It's awesome.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have the shirt, the bumper stickers

That's creepy and weird just like how it's creepy and weird with the whole trump cult. It's politics, not some concert for a band

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's creepy and weird just like how it's creepy and weird with the whole trump cult. It's politics, not some concert for a band

So you think all the people who have the Biden, and now Harris stickers and shirts are creepy and weird?

She just talked at a convention and there were thousands wearing Harris shirts.

You think that's creepy and weird?! All those democrats are creepy and weird?

Ok, man, good luck!

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it's creepy and weird. I dgaf what 'side' your on. It's politics, not some fan club. It's all around weird and creepy.

You think you're doing some kinda gotcha thing? Lol add pathetic to the pile just for you

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it’s creepy and weird. I dgaf what ‘side’ your on. It’s politics, not some fan club. It’s all around weird and creepy.

Ok, be sure to tell the thousands of people that wear Biden-Harris shirts that.

You realize that EVERY party has people who like to wear their shirts, right?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You realize that it's still creepy and weird to idolize parties of politics right.

I don't care what 'side' does it. It's creepy and weird. Stop trying to spin this like you know my political stance. I'm staying neutral for a reason.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don’t care what ‘side’ does it. It’s creepy and weird.

And I am fine if you think that. You are definitely entitled to your opinion.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't asking for your approval on my thoughts.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

That's ok, too. But letting each other know our thoughts is sorta what this sub is about. Have a great day! And you are entitled to your opinion. And I am ok that you don't like mine.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just because you are sick of it doesn't mean FPTP magically has less of an impact on third-party votes this particular election. If you've been around that long you are well aware of how meaningless and potentially dangerous it is, and yes it sucks but the way to combat a two-party system is not voting third party and hoping for the best. Doing that is only creating a mental out for feeling morally superior.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Just because you are sick of it doesn’t mean FPTP magically has less of an impact on third-party votes this particular election.

Of course not. But I'm practicing the change i wanna see. I'm down listening to you guys keep saying, "next time! Next time, we'll fix it. Promise!"

Nah, fam. No more next times. I'm voting for who I want. And so are my friends.

I don't even know why you're upset tho, Democrats will probably win this year anyway. Hey! So then are you all gonna fix FPTP issue? Hmmmm. if I were a betting man...

If you’ve been around that long you are well aware of how meaningless and potentially dangerous it is,

No, what's dangerous is our system being run by a duopoly. I won't support it anymore. Many of my friends agree.

Doing that is only creating a mental out for feeling morally superior.

If you are worried about it, choose a better democratic candidate. I don't like Harris. And I don't like Trump. Soooo I won't vote for Harris. And I won't vote for Trump. See how that works?

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

First, let’s be clear: voting is a fundamental American right, and every citizen has the right to vote for the candidate they believe in, without being accused of ulterior motives. The idea that supporting a third party is somehow working for Trump or any other major candidate is both historically inaccurate and logically flawed.

Throughout American history, third parties have played a crucial role in shaping political discourse and pushing important issues into the spotlight.

The abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, and labor rights were all advanced by third parties before being adopted by the major parties.

By voting for Jill Stein and the Green Party, I am supporting a platform that aligns with my values, particularly on issues like environmental sustainability, social justice, and democratic reform.

The notion that a vote for a third party “dilutes” the vote is rooted in a fear-driven mentality rather than in democratic principles.

It assumes that votes are owned by the two major parties, which they are not. Our electoral system is supposed to represent the diverse views of the electorate, not just those of the dominant parties.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I applaud your frustration at our voting system because I share that frustration, but the whole crux of it is that it results in a two party system. Your green party vote, in the grand scheme of things (at least in terms of making an actual difference), is a wasted one.

I honestly don't know how we will ever make this change. It's going to require people like Joe Biden that are willing to give up tremendous power in order to make a change for the better.

Politicians in general aren't really good at letting go of power. One of our dominant parties especially will never allow this to happen - they cannot even accept the outcome of a fair-ish election (even though they were assisted by their gerrymandering and voter suppression and voter roll purging). It won't be until the US has a very progressive phase that we have a chance of making this change.

Until we can make meaningful changes to enable us to make a change to our voting system, any vote for someone not in one of those two parties will be seen as an attempt to dilute the vote, and will also realistically have people be very suspicious towards you. This is especially the case if one were to post continually to this community and keep pushing the idea.

To recap - fundamental, core changes need to happen first before we have a remote chance of being able to make a difference outside of the two dominant parties. You should, however, vote for who you want, that's your right!

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You've got it exactly right here. The big key is that this critical "core change" only happens at the local level. RCV has to be implemented in countywide and statewide election systems, proving that it works, before any third party can hope to effect change and pressure for RCV and reforms at a national House/Senate/President level.
People like OP who bitch and moan about not wanting the two party system and wanting a (wasted) third party in a high profile race like POTUS simultaneously refuse to notice or care that all that change has to start BELOW. You can't just keep your head in the sand for 4 years, then pop up to vote for Jill Stein and expect everything to be hunky dory. You have to be on the beat for every office, even ones as low as ward representatives for your city, trying to support and promote candidates who want to implement RCV and 3rd party independence. Targeting the big race with a no-name candidate is a waste of resources, and always has been.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You can’t just keep your head in the sand for 4 years, then pop up to vote for Jill Stein and expect everything to be hunky dory.

I have supported the green party in my state for a while. Through ballet initiatives and access, to local elections. What makes you think I just pop and vote just in Pres elections?

I've been voting for longer than you have been alive, comrade.

Targeting the big race with a no-name candidate is a waste of resources, and always has been.

And always will be as long as people like you belittle people who are trying to make a change. I'm voting Green Party, as is my right, and I'm proud of it.

I've made donations, I've volunteered for my local Green party, I have my bumper stickers and even my Green Party shirt, friend. And I'll keep working for what I believe in. Even if you're upset that it's not YOUR candidate.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

If you are that worried about spoilers, then you should have a stronger candidate. I, and many others, don't support her. That's how democracy works.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

your green party vote, in the grand scheme of things (at least in terms of making an actual difference), is a wasted one.

Voting for who I want, even if YOU don't like that person, is not a wasted vote. If the democrats are so worried about "spoilers," then they need stronger candidates.

I'm voting for who I want to be president. And right now, that's Jill Stein.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You misread my comment. I directly said you should vote for who you want and truly mean that. What I said was that your vote IN TERMS OF ACTUALLY MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN THE OUTCOME is a wasted vote, and that is a fact that comes with the FPTP voting system.

But since you snapped back with throwing shade at "my candidate" your posts and comments are even more suspicious.

I'll be blocking your spam from here on out. I really do think you should vote for who you want though. It's just not going to make a damn bit of difference in this election.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

I directly said you should vote for who you want and truly mean that.

I will. And it's Jill Stein

is a wasted vote

Not wasted at all, because I am voting for who I want to vote for. As is my right.

I’ll be blocking your spam from here on out.

Spam? I don't think that word means what you think it means. But yes, feel free to block me, because you haven't changed my mind. At all.