this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10181 readers
67 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

MADISON, Wisconsin — On an oppressively hot August day in downtown Madison, the signs of this famously liberal city’s progressive activism are everywhere. Buildings are draped in pride flags and Black Lives Matter signs are prominently displayed on storefronts. A musty bookstore advertises revolutionary titles and newspaper clippings of rallies against Donald Trump. A fancy restaurant features a graphic of a raised Black fist in its window, with chalk outside on the sidewalk reading “solidarity forever.”

Yet the Green Party, which bills itself as an independent political party that has the best interests of self-described leftists at heart, is nowhere to be found. It has no storefronts, no candidates running for local office, no relationship with the politically active UW-Madison campus, which has almost 50,000 students.

Where it does have purchase is in the nightmares of local Democrats, who are deeply afraid of the effect the third party might have here in November. As one of the seven presidential battleground states, Wisconsin is a critical brick in the so-called Blue Wall, the term for the run of Rust Belt states that are essential to Kamala Harris’ chances of winning the presidency. It’s a deeply divided state that’s become notorious for its razor-thin margins of victory — a place where statewide elections are so close that even tenths of a percentage point matter. Against that backdrop, the Green Party looms very large this year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh my god, how many times does it need to be said?

Shoot for the impossible and earn yourselves a dictatorship by splitting the vote and electing Trump. Be ready with the champagne if he wins because you'll've been a big part of that and you should be proud.

Why do you think she was hobnobbing with Putin? The only question is whether she knows she's being played for a fool here.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you want to convince people who're upset with the Democrats' poor policy offerings to vote for them, you aren't going to do it by shaming them into settling for less. It does not and will never work.

If the Democrats want to win, it is on them to offer an actually appealing platform. Blame them for failing at that.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That doesn’t matter in the US election system. You’re going to get Kamala or Trump, so pick the one that is more tolerable to you.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Democrats' own platform doesn't matter?!

I really hope I don't need to explain why this is an obnoxiously awful take.

[–] Quexotic@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they're just advocating practical harm reduction. In a 2 party country without ranked choice voting (obv there's more to it than that.. not writing an essay here), you'll only ever have the 2 choices.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

If they're arguing that people should vote, or that they shouldn't vote Green due to spoiler effects, then they're not arguing with me, frankly.

My position throughout this thread is that it's folly to avoid pressuring Democrat tickets to improve their platform, not that anyone should abstain from voting or vote third party. I'm going to vote in November and it won't be for the Greens. The key part is that I also plan to shame the Dem ticket for doing such a poor job in the meantime, too; they need to move left now, not later.