this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
68 points (80.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40218 readers
1072 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
68
I tried to selfhost Nextcloud at work (feddit.it)
submitted 1 month ago by Moonrise2473@feddit.it to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

And it failed spectacularly.

We only needed a simple form, but we wanted to be fancy, so we used "nextcloud forms".

The docker image automatically updated the install to nextcloud 30, but the forms app requires nextcloud 29 or lower. No warning whatsoever. It's an official app, couldn't they wait that it was ready for NC 30 before launching it? The newsletter boasts "NC hub 9 is the best thing after sliced bread" yet i don't see any difference both in visual or performance compared to NC hub 2

Conclusion: we made our business to rely on nextcloud forms as a signup form, but the only reason we were using it was disabled who knows how many weeks ago.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

Yep, and I'd guess there's probably a huge component of "it must be as easy as possible" because the primary target is selfhosters that don't really even want to learn how to set up Docker containers properly.

The AIO Docker image is an abomination. The other ones are slightly more sane but they still fundamentally mix code and data in the same folder so it's not trivial to just replace the app.

In Docker, the auto updater should be completely neutered, it's the wrong way to update the app.

The packages in the Arch repo are legit saner than the Docker version.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I had to learn how to mount subpaths for their terrible container, and god just the updater is mind boggling. And I have to store their code in a volume, because of course I have to, why would code and configuration ever need to be... configurable? I actually just tried to put their config.php into a ConfigMap just to try, and of course PHP doesn't allow that - not that I blame PHP for it - but ffs it's been years, it's time to allow config to also come from a yaml or something.

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

OwnCloud rewrite in Go is way better

https://owncloud.dev/ocis/

[–] anzo@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm attracted to it because of the posix backend. Did anyone try it? Is it stable?

For reference, https://owncloud.dev/architecture/posixfs-storage-driver/

[–] Lem453@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I'm testing it now. Seems way faster and more stable.

I'm just trying to get the oauth login to work but the actual file sync works great.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)