You can have any colour you like, as long as it's black.
but we don't even want it to begin with
Yes, that's why you want the black one.
You can have any colour you like, as long as it's black.
but we don't even want it to begin with
Yes, that's why you want the black one.
I honestly don't know how they're so disconnected from reality. To in the same statement within 2 paragraphs say they both want to be more focused on the gamer, and immediately then say "More GenAI, more recurring payments, more Games as a Service". I just, I don't know man. I don't want layoffs but man they really just don't get it do they?
Yeah so, we know gamers have hated our stuff because of these horrible shitty practices - but, and hear me out, what if we did that stuff even more, don't even mention things like great stories and fun worlds or anything gamers have been asking for, and also laid off most of our staff and forced return to office too?
Ubisoft founder and CEO, Yves Guillemot, said the company must pursue a "radically new" value-creation model and become a more "gamer-centric" organization to find its footing in an increasingly competitive and selective triple-A market.
Good! Realizing it needs to be about the gamer again not just shareholder value.
"The new operating model will further empower the execution of the Group's strategy, centered on Open World Adventures and GaaS-native experiences, supported by targeted investments, deeper specialization, and cutting-edge technology, including accelerated investments behind player-facing Generative AI," reads the document.
Oh god damnit nevermind, the boycott continues
It took me a second watchthrough to fully grasp what was happening, but you're spot on.
Guy was supposed to get out, they just upped his sentence and moved him.
They'll be fully vertically integrated they mean.
Lovers in a dangerous spacetime was a ton of fun! Very adorable, simple mechanics, plays on one screen, and not too hard. Also came out over 5 years ago so win win
So weird. Watched all good things last night.
Like I said, I was agreeing with your title. Thought we were going to have an interesting conversation on AI generated rage bait. Here we are instead.
Technically, I didn't read the post, but agreed with your title. Then all of your comments after I've accused of baiting, but yeah maybe the post was just to bait too.
Stop trying to bait us.
No. No it was not. None of them have been.
Let's take your first question.
Honest question, are you good just passively watching all this MAGA shit spread?
There was nothing honest about this. I said I didn't want to read the Facebook post. An honest question would have been:
I know there are many reasons why not you but why don't you want to go on Facebook?
That's an honest question.
You had a very obvious agenda. You are obviously trying to bait me into some argument, which I am not getting into with you. Your question was completely dishonest, because it both did not ask me about anything relevant to what I said, and there was also no way for me to answer you without you having a fully planned response.
We aren't taking the rage bait. That's for Facebook. Stop trying to bait us.
Everything I don't like is because of the others!