this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
329 points (97.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54227 readers
637 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LMAO. Fuck Nintendo and the "do as I say not as I do" BS.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Emulation is perfectly legal if you own the game.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And yet Nintendo files bogus copyright claims against emulators.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They're not bogus. The emulator that shut down were selling a product using a proprietary encryption key owned by Nintendo.

That's why Dolphin still exists.

[–] catsup@lemmy.one 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Proprietary encryption key

What if the key was in a book? It would have to be protected by free-speech, which makes it uncensorable.

What if the key contents were used as hex values to make a flag? Would you censor a flag too?

No such thing as "proprietary encryption keys" exist.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The key wasn't used in a book or in the hex values for a flag. That's like saying the formula for Coke can't be proprietary because it could be put in a book.

Software can absolutely be proprietary, and that key is part of the software.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Fuck that and proprietary recipes too. It's just a scheme to manufacture scarcity and grant everlasting monopolies on production.

Both things should be in the public domain by now, the concept of century plus term copyright is a grift to own culture, they're just going to keep extending it until companies can have permanent ownership of ideas.

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I disagree. Sure, companies have a moral right to recoup their R&D costs on a console, but I fully reject the Divine Right of Shareholders. As long as the emulators aren't sold for profit and no one is hurt, a multibillion dollar company like Nintendo has zero moral ground to tell us that we cannot emulate consoles that we have bought to play games that we also bought.

The emulator they shut down was being sold for a profit. They haven't gone after Dolphin, which is free.

[–] kralk@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 8 points 15 hours ago

Well the dev closed it without any public c&d...

Maybe the thousands of copyrighted images of amiibos hosted on https://amiibo.ryujinx.org/ ?

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago

~~do as I say not as I do~~

Nintendo: Money! Fuck everything else.

All other attributes derive from that.