this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
357 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19043 readers
4281 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] terraborra@lemmy.nz 120 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

The grilling exposed Trump’s total cluelessness with regard to his own economic policy, and led Trump to attack Micklethwait as biased.

Yes the notably socialist empire of Bloomberg, used by communist stock traders around the world, is biased against the totally rational and very cool Trump economic “plan”.

Maybe adopting failed economic policies from the 1920s (and older) isn’t a winning formula?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago

I love this video so much. The interviewer asks Shapiro to defend his stances and Shapiro responds by calling the interviewer a liberal.

"A Georgia law you support would have women who had a miscarriage face trail for potentialy 30 years in jail. Isn't that a bit harsh?"

"Oh, sorry, I didn't know you were A LIBERAL!"

[–] LotzaSpaghetti@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing Neil’s background and then watching this video gives one truly one of the most delicious viewings of all time.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

I watched it without and it was still interesting. What's Neil's background? Seemed like a super nice old guy.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

I believe Andrew Neil himself is rather conservative. So Shapiro accusing him of being a liberal is... even more absurd.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 21 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump? You want some certainty in the market, not some dementia patient steering the wheel with Christian Nationalists like Stephen Miller whispering directions in his ear.

[–] synae@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 7 hours ago

He creates turmoil and doubt, which is fertile ground for scams and cons.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump?

Tax cuts for the rich

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lot of fucking good that's going to do them when nobody can afford to buy their shit

Who are you going to sell to? Because it ain't me, and it ain't 99% of the rest of the American people. So if these rich fucks want to chase their infinite paycheck, they're going to need some revenue.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh but for one glorious quarter, profits will be through the roof. The collapse of democracy afterwards will be an unfortunate market adjustment

[–] DekesEnormous@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Ah the ol’ pump-and-dump-a-roo

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

“What does The Wall Street Journal know? They’ve been wrong about everything, and so have you by the way, you’ve been wrong,” Trump replied, crossing his arms and curling into his seat.

Ah, yes, the well known unreputable, woke, liberal extremist publication, the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of people with a high degree of expertise in one area are deficient in other areas, but wrongly assume they are geniuses in all areas.

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago

I just assume I'm a dipshit across the board so I can be pleasantly surprised any time I do something competently

[–] terraborra@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 hours ago

Cocaine’s a hell of a drug.