this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
264 points (97.8% liked)

Work Reform

10011 readers
325 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't the broken-by-Congress railroad strike demonstrate that Biden, et al. have already chosen their side, and that it isn't labor?

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

For who didn't, it's worth it to read the whole article. It's this stuff that doesn't make the news.

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Thank you for posting this. I'm so tired of the rhetoric surrounding the rail strike.

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't allow them to strike. It doesn't matter that they still helped the union negotiate. They kneecapped their bargaining power.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Libs are just as deaf to criticism of their party as conservatives are.

A successful rail strike would have emboldened the working class, whatever the administration did after doesn't negate the damage they did to the current labor movement by stopping it.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

This union didn't vote to strike. They were fine with the original agreement without sick days and didn't have anything taken away in the congressional strike breaking.

[–] blazera@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Its always IBEW

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Source: union trying to spin a measly 4 sick days in an entire year as a complete victory while giving Biden oversized credit for merely APPOINTING the people who did all the work.

While he DOES deserve a little credit for appointing good pro-union people to the relevant posts, this wasn't his doing.

The only thing HE did personally was use his influence as president to effectively strip them of their hard won right to strike by forcing them to (provisionally, but still) accept a bad agreement from his owner donors in the corrupt rail industry.

[–] CabbageRelish@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

Not a union that had and still has strike-worthy grievances, or a major union within the railroad industry. Has made a great pro-Biden press piece though.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep. I was hoping someone would comment this. He didn't want to take an economic hit right before the midterms, so broke the strike but also essentially made the reailroad give concessions.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Less than 50% of what they were seeking though, it’s a concession, not a victory. They got 4 whole days, wow, such good.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When people strike, they do not unyieldingly demand 100% of what they asked for initially. It is a negotiation. They negotiate. While 50% is not ideal, it is progress and pretty decent concessions.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Less than 50%, 28% to be precise. That’s just the sick days, if we include all the other things they were asking for, they got less than 10% of what they asked for.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Media cycles have broken people's memory.