this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
977 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3163 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cool story, but a once every 150 years pandemic is hardly a good reason to keep wasting money on storing stuff. A fire or a flood was much more likely to wipe it all out in 50 years.

Even in your anecdote the owner never actually benefited from the extra costs.

Depending on what you're producing costs to maintain extra inventory of raw materials can be massive and for the company the size of Toyota, multiply that by million.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong, but the real answer is somewhere in between.

[–] Kurroth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Even in your anecdote the owner never actually benefited from the extra costs.

Imagine doing something or having a life/business philosophy that doesn't exist for your own soul benefit, and exists maybe for the benefit of others.