this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
305 points (99.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6623 readers
281 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

well sure, but they'll need running water and a functioning sewer system for those. That's the hard part, at least in NK!

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The toilets are for seating. Not enough chairs in NK.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe it's for wine

[–] tal@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://www.rfa.org/english/news/korea/nk-manure-quota-2020-10142019154836.html

Citizens Fight Over Feces to Fill Human Fertilizer Quota in North Korea

Competition for human feces has become cutthroat in North Korea, as authorities have burdened citizens with impossible collection quotas to prepare fertilizer for next year’s farming season.

In impoverished North Korea, farms are fertilized using human waste, and the government tasks every household with yearly collection quotas.

RFA reported in January, shortly after leader Kim Jong Un’s New Year’s address, that households were struggling to meet an impossible quota amounting to 100 kilograms (220 pounds) per able-bodied citizen.

If you have access to a source of poop in North Korea, I assume that you're not going to simply flush it away, even if you had the infrastructure to give you that option.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thank you. That's horrifying. There's not enough animal manure, ashes or bones for the fields because ...?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I'm not an expert in the situation, but I'd guess that:

  • Animal manure. We're wealthy enough that we don't think about it much, but meat is calorie inefficient, something for the wealthy. North Korea is pretty poor, has had recent problems just feeding the population, has seen famine. Unless you're part of the regime -- I suspect, looking at his figure, that Kim Jong Un is getting a healthy dose of calorie-rich foods -- I doubt that a lot of meat consumption is happening in North Korea. If you're having a hard time getting enough calories produced, you aren't going to be targeting luxuries like meat.

    kagis

    https://archive.ph/osH3s/again?url=https://www.nknews.org/2022/04/how-north-korea-tried-and-failed-to-boost-consumption-of-the-other-white-meat/

    North Korea has never been a nation of meat eaters, even considering an increase in consumption under Kim Jong Un, but that does not mean the country’s people do not like meat. On the contrary, meat has always been a desirable and prestigious delicacy in the DPRK, as it is throughout East Asia.

    The problem has always been that high population density has required the use of nearly all available flat land for rice paddy fields, since an acre of agricultural land produces roughly ten times the calories of an acre of pasture.

    This says that meat consumption did increase somewhat under Kim Jong Un:

    https://www.38north.org/2023/09/north-koreas-animal-protein-farming-expansion-status-and-challenges-2/

    Prior to 2000, except for North Korea’s elites, the country subsisted principally on vegetarian diets. To have meat as few as two to three times a year was the apparent norm. Under Kim Jong Il, that began to change as efforts to expand the availability of animal protein to more of the population began around 2005.

  • Ashes. I don't think that this is a substitute, don't think that nitrogen at least is provided, which is the most-critical thing that fertilizer normally provides.

    kagis

    Sounds like it.

    https://gardening.usask.ca/articles-and-lists/articles-how-to/using-wood-ash-in-the-garden.php

    Is wood ash a good fertilizer? 

    Wood ash adds nutrients to your soil, but the amount varies according to the kind of wood burned. Generally, the largest ingredient in wood ash is calcium carbonate (about 20%). This is followed by potassium (less than 10%), phosphorus (1%) and trace amounts of micro-nutrients such as iron, manganese, boron, copper and zinc. Wood ash does not contain nitrogen. 

    Used in moderation, wood ash helps to fertilize your soil. However, since wood ash has no nitrogen at all, it is not a complete fertilizer. Adding compost to your soil will help meet the other nutrient needs of your plants.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertilizer

    Nitrogen-fixing chemical processes, such as the Haber process invented at the beginning of the 20th century, and amplified by production capacity created during World War II, led to a boom in using nitrogen fertilizers.[2] In the latter half of the 20th century, increased use of nitrogen fertilizers (800% increase between 1961 and 2019) has been a crucial component of the increased productivity of conventional food systems (more than 30% per capita) as part of the so-called "Green Revolution".[3]

  • Bones. Bones come from animals. See above point about meat.

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

wow that's awful, no wonder they're opting to join the Russians!