this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
846 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9628 readers
626 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

While this is nice, I do not really see any places where one can now cross the street?
Some cut-outs for pedestrians would probably be helpful for people who need to access a building on the other side.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 76 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Rue du Dr Paquelin was pedestrianized so crosswalks aren't really needed.

It's a very small street.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I don't mean crosswalks, I mean places where people can cut through the greenery to get to the "road".
As it stands now I don't see a way for people to actually get to the other side of the street.

Maybe they exist, but I don't see them in the picture..

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, I see what you mean. You're right, if there's a path through the bushes it's not obvious.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 weeks ago

I think you see the start of a path halfway down the road on both sides

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You mean like access front doors of buildings? It looks like they block everything.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think the old sidewalks are still there on the other side of the bushes. There is certainly space for them.

[–] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe they should have just treed the middle of the road and left the outside free for movement?

[–] QualifiedKitten@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Whoa! Checking out street view, I'm so impressed by the bike/scooter shares all being parked relatively neatly in designated areas at either end of the block where they aren't blocking the pedestrian paths!

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah. I'd do more little islands instead, which would also give space for other stuff, like benches or other seating areas, bike racks, etc.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Move the road over to one side, and give double space for greenery on the other side.
Then you can add benches, playgrounds, etc.

Still.. As it currently stands it is an improvement over what came before

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe the buses are trees and they plan to put seating under as they grow ?

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Definitely agreed. Strictly better than cars, but there has to be something we're missing here, else this is a huuuge pain in the ass for literally no reason.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have to disagree. Amenities such as benchs, and playgrounds can be place into the next street but there is a need to add important vegetation at least in some streets of dense urban environment to deal with heat wave and flood issues.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The problem isn't the vegetation; it's the lack of outlets to the other side of the road amid the vegetation. From the perspective shown here, it's a solid 40-ish meters until the next entrance to the sidewalk.

[–] pseudo@jlai.lu 4 points 3 weeks ago

That is probably just perspective. By zooming, I can see two possibles places when they might be outlets.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Idk looks like a pretty short street to me I’d say it’s fine

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

Given that a guy is walking in the middle of the street, why do you assume that cars are even allowed?