this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
91 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers
316 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this new? Does anyone what the deal is?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 64 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Probably because Google is actively and frequently banning many Piped or Invidious hosts, and is generally currently at war with "alternative frontends" to YouTube in an effort to make users browse YouTube directly and consume ads there, or buy YouTube Premium. This is in line with their current fight for more ad revenues across their products and services. You probably have to either search for another public instance which isn't banned (yet) from accessing YouTube, or host your own instance.

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can confirm it. Self-hosting Invidious on my laptop is working.

[–] scarcity_of_the_self@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Private frontends and decentralized social media like Funkwhale and PeerTube will really be the most accessible form of piracy ever if more people start using it this way

[–] TheSyndZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with Peertube mass adoption are bandwidth and size of videos. Are the servers behind public instances are prepared for that ..?