this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1202 points (97.6% liked)

politics

30960 readers
2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

This pyrrhic victory neglects to recognize that either Trump or Harris will be elected. And there is no circumstance that Trump is better than Harris. Not on women's rights. Not on climate change. Not on Ukraine. And not on Gaza.

Whether you like it or not, it's Harris or Trump. Sticking your head in the sand doesn't change this fact.

So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil that gives the highest odds to improve all these groups. Which is Harris. Factually.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

Me voting wouldn't change the outcome either, considering I can't.

 

So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil

Is killing wrong?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes, killing wrong.

Killing more people with less chance to kill fewer people more wrong.

Again, dichotomous choice. Easiest choice to make, really.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If killing is wrong, then voting to kill some rather than more is still wrong.

I request better options.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Correction: it is less wrong.

Standing by and letting someone kill more when your action could've resulted in less makes you as culpable in the killing as Biden and Harris themselves.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're standing by to let killing happen right now. I'm the one saying that's unacceptable.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You can't vote so you're irrelevant but still, no, the only agency I'm privileged to have is my vote. Doing nothing means more die. Voting Harris means less die. Simple.