Steam Deck

14847 readers

91 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Follow the rules of Sopuli
Posts must be related to the Steam Deck in an obvious way.
No piracy, there are other communities for that.
Discussion of emulators are allowed, but no discussion on how to illegally acquire ROMs.
This is a place of civil discussion, no trolling.
Have fun.

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

Moxvallix@sopuli.xyz

timi@lemmy.world

RolAIDS05@lemmy.world

Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz

RolAIDS05@sopuli.xyz

codus@leby.dev

389

Steam games will now need to fully disclose kernel-level anti-cheat on store pages (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz to c/steamdeck@sopuli.xyz

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Developers will be required to disclose if their game uses kernel anti-cheat. This applies to both new games and existing games. Non-kernel anti-cheat is encouraged to be disclosed as well, but it's only mandatory for developers to declare if they're using kernel anti-cheat for the time being.

It's worth mentioning that many games use kernel anti-cheat on windows, but only use user space anti-cheat on Steam Deck and Linux.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 99 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Now punish publishers who try to change the terms of sale after sale. “Want to play the single player game you bought a decade ago? Agree to this new arbitration clause.”

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Games that change their terms post-sale should present the customer the option for an automatic no-questions-asked refund. Leaving the customer with the options: Agree, Decline, Refund.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hmm, you have uncovered a problem with both of our ideas. Steam’s leverage is reduced after they have deposited sales proceeds, and is gone after the publisher isn’t selling games on the platform any longer.

(I’m griping about Rockstar specifically but my point is still flawed in the general case.)

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Add a clause to the contract between Steam and the developer requiring the dev to reimburse Steam for refunds due to post-sale changes (ie, from that specific 'accept, decline, refund' option). If the dev doesn't pay the bill, Steam can use the breach of contract as leverage.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 24 points 2 weeks ago

Include adding kernel level anti cheat to that. This should just give us an option to get a full refund.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

At the very least a choice. Keep using it as is or get updates related to the new agreement.

[–] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

It should only be applicable to new sales. Old sales should function the same as before.