this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
375 points (96.3% liked)

News

23284 readers
3703 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tyson Foods and the federal government refuse to show their math for a new sustainability label.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

America's richest 10% are responsible for 40% of climate change. You're butthurt that I'm using living modestly while rich assholes profit from making the climate problem exponentially worse. I would say don't bootlick for the rich, but I'm not sure you're intelligent enough to change your worldview "bud".

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're sharing the same article I'm quoting from, which is making a stupid argument.

If you want to fight climate change, you must understand that aggregate demand is the driver of climate change. Companies don't get rich by fucking up the planet. Companies get rich by selling people shit. The shit they sell is fucking up the planet. Cut the demand and you lessen the fuckening.

The way forward is by tackling aggregate demand, ideally through carbon taxes and investment/subsidies in green technologies.

I am a literal climate lobbyist, and this is the angle actual people involved in fighting climate change work from.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a climate scientist and a sociologist. If you think that we can get everyone on the same page about giving up their personal liberties and small pleasures (like eating meat) so the rich can continue to exploit the problem further for their own profit, we've already lost.

The only path forward is to jail the corporate executives and rich assholes causing the lion's share of the issue, but instead we get bootlickers arguing for an impossible goal of herding a bunch of cats to stop doing something they love to make up for problems mostly caused by the richest 10%.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you think that we can get everyone on the same page

I literally say the opposite of this

The only path forward is to jail the corporate executives and rich assholes causing the lion’s share of the issue

In addition to being completely unhinged, this does not address demand at all and someone else will simply start selling those fuels and products/services

You're either lying or terrible at your job.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can see you're having trouble understanding basic logic. Let me explain it to you this way:

If I started a business throwing used motor oil into the ocean, I could charge people next to nothing to take their oil. I would make huge profits by destroying our planet. Your strategy would be to convince all the poor people in America not to use the cheapest option to dispose of their oil. Many Americans don't have a choice between using an expensive "good for the Earth" option and my business that throws it into ocean for cheap.

You lack an understanding of the people you're trying to coordinate. Many Americans lack the time and the money to correctly choose the most environmentally friendly option. You will never get everyone on the same page. The only path forward is to punish the rich assholes actually causing the lion's share of the problem.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is an idiotic counter-factual.

The reality is, fossil fuels companies are constantly listed as "top contributors" because they fucking sell fossil fuels.

Until we remove the present need for fossil fuels by disincentivizing them in favor of green technology, then we will continue on this path. Fossil fuels aren't burnt for fun. They are used to power homes, transportation, etc. That's what we need to tackle.

I understand it is attractive to have a "villain" to point at. It makes things much easier for you and absolves you of your role. However, this is both non-productive and, ultimately, objectively incorrect.

You're correct that voluntary abstinence is not enough to be meaningfully impactful, that's why we lobby for government subsidies and, ideally, carbon taxation.

I know you, personally, are a lost cause - you'll fight anything that will "disadvantage" you. I'm writing this because some lurker will see it and that'll be one more vote. One vote at a time is how we win.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see you were unable to refute any of my points. Instead you continue to bootlick for the rich just like every other lobbyist. Fuck off plutocrat parasite.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

I literally refuted all of your points.

If anyone is interested in meaningfully fighting climate change, I highly recommend you get involved.

It's free, volunteer work, doesn't take a lot of your time, and you'll speak face to face with representatives. You can be involved on any level you'd like

https://citizensclimatelobby.org/donate-earth-lobbyists/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=G_S_Utah-NB&gclid=CjwKCAjwr_CnBhA0EiwAci5siiPUuUAGRZ5ipBO_D0ZfrGvuXC3hvpCRJEt4XUxmUwVJvbM-Xym-QBoCm84QAvD_BwE