this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
347 points (98.3% liked)

Games

32953 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I doubt anything comes of it, but here's hoping.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Out of curiosity, did anyone sue bungie for doing the same thing with destiny's Y1 & Y2 content?

I was one of those dumb bastards who bought the game and DLC back in 2017

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

It gets to be way harder to argue in court when it isn't a "clean kill", using Ross Scott's words, so The Crew is going to be one of the best examples we'll ever get for courts to rule on. I expect Ubisoft would rather settle than let this one go that far though.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I imagine a lawsuit would likely bring up the topic of how hard it would be for a developer to keep the game around past purchase.

For instance, imagine a massively multiplayer online game; everyone playing the game is acutely aware of how much server hardware is needed to maintain that online presence, and it's unrealistic to assume it would exist forever.

That's probably why attention was pushed onto The Crew. It's a racing game that shouldn't need much from a server, so it's arguably unfair to tie it to that access and take it offline.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it's unrealistic to assume it would exist forever.

Older multiplayer games would let you self-host the server, long before the current trend.

Ubisoft doesn't have to continue to host servers. They just have to release the server code. Zero cost to them.

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

zero cost to them

I would imagine it would reveal how sh*tty the ubisoft code bases are and has a reputation cost XD. But if it's that big of a risk then they should keep the servers running indefinitely.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I mean, they don't have to release the source code. A compiled version would be fine.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pirates have managed to run servers for tons of MMOs. The only thing stopping people from running servers themselves is that they're not made available.

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

That's why companies shutting down online games need to be compelled to open-source or at least provide binaries for their servers.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Don't get it wrong, the reason The Crew was the perfect game to start the movement is solely because Ubisoft is french, a country that has pretty strong consumer laws that they aren't respecting.