this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
959 points (98.1% liked)

People Twitter

5227 readers
434 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 159 points 3 days ago (117 children)

I’ve read that blockchain itself is a good technology. NFTs are a laughably absurd attempt to exploit that technology for profit.

Xitter op needs to shut up.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 51 points 3 days ago (53 children)

What problem does blockchain solve?

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I've heard of using them as parts of like contracts?

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does blockchain solve that existing contracts don’t do? Blockchain has takeover possibility

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I don't know. I'm just pointing out the only thing that kind of sort of sounded like a good idea for it I've ever heard. For pictures it's stupid that's for sure

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s not a picture though. It’s a link to a picture on a server somewhere. If the host goes down, you own nothing.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it just a small amount of data? If the picture is small enough you could put it directly on the blockchain.

Dunno why you would though. It's very limiting for no particular gain.

[–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But in NFTs the picture is not on the Blockchain. Only a link to the picture is on the Blockchain and the picture itself is still just on the web.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

No, they are right. What they are saying is that even though pretty much all NFTs contain a link to a picture on the blockchain, theoretically you could write a really, really small image in the space where you would normally write the URL. From a quick google, that’s 100 bytes. For a black and white image, that’s 100 pixels. For color, that’s around 30 pixels

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The technology behind it can be used for things other than pictures. That's kind of the point people are making

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Right, and my original question was what does the technology solve? And so far the answer appears to be nothing

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
load more comments (113 replies)