this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
939 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

5222 readers
1908 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a solution that allows two parties, who are so paranoid they don't trust banks, let alone one another, to send funds and maintain a record of transactions with one another.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it requires a lot more than two parties, because the resulting “funds” from the transaction still have to be valued by everyone else that provide goods and services. So it becomes a social issue if it is to be a currency, and then you just end up re-discovering all the lessons that lead to how currencies already work.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The valuation of Bitcoin is a completely separate topic than practical use cases of blockchain.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Incorrect. The transaction is not practically useful unless the currency has real value.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Once again, we are talking about blockchain, not Bitcoin

You realize blockchain is used by many large companies for practical purposes, not just by hobbyists swapping magical internet money, right?

Many large retailers (e.g. Walmart) and pharmaceutical companies use managed blockchain solutions (e.g. IBMs supply chain software) to track end to end process flow and see the pedigree of products at their end destination, because it means the end user doesn't need to request unfettered access to 6 different companies ERP systems to know when the hell their purchase order is getting delivered

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They really, truly don’t. There are a few “pilot projects” so that the companies can tell investors that they have a “blockchain strategy” but the world runs off of normal databases.

[–] bjorney@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago

The poster above asked for a use case. I gave one.

Frankly I don't give a shit if the market penetration of said use case doesn't meet whatever arbitrary cutoff you have deemed sufficient for something to "exist" or not - the QR code on the back of every north american bag of Starbucks beans is proof enough. Whether its more or efficient than a traditional RDBMS is irrelevant