this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
284 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37608 readers
251 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gas is great if you need to boil a pot of water right now. Like in a restaurant kitchen.

Any application that is not in a massive rush is just fine on electric.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even modern radiant electric boils water faster (pretty typical for even a pretty low-end electric top to have a 3500-5000W quick boil burner). And induction or a kettle both do it a near order of magnitude faster. Not to mention none of them hugely heat up the room or require a superpower ventilator that sucks out your conditioned air. If boiling water fast is the task you care about, gas is almost certainly the worst choice. At least for home use.

Commercial kitchens are a different story that isn't even part of the discussion. Even with three-phase power, to run an all-electric mid size-large commercial kitchen would likely require some crazy service level that wouldn't be available in many places. It'll be a while before that is an option.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

If boiling water fast is the task you care about, gas is almost certainly the worst choice. At least for home use.

Well technically electric ranges are worse, but other than that you're right.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even then induction is faster and cooks more even, maybe restaurants need open flame, but yeah I don't think anyone at home needs gas anymore. If you don't care how you cook you can go electric. If you really care in many ways induction is better than gas.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Really, the only thing you can't do on an electric range that you can do on a typical gas cooker is, for example, directly fire a pepper.

And you really don't need to do that. You can just do it under the broiler, for example. I also don't even insist on induction. A mid-range radiant top is STILL better than gas, in my opinion, though the induction is worth it if you can afford it.

People will bring up woks a lot, but a gas range also can't draw out the real advantages of a wok and you're better off with an outdoor chimney cooker or a dedicated wok burner (induction with a small torch or gas bottle) if that's what you really care about.

Plus, I must again point out how fucking AWFUL it is to clean a gas cooktop compared to how trivially easy it is to clean a glass-top electric cooker. The time saved cleaning more than makes up for the advantages people list with gas even if we grant those advantages exist. Which I clearly don't.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

many people just have a lil' torch for when they need flame, presumably vastly more efficient than turning on an entire burner just to scorch a chili

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

restaurants need open flame

They don't; not from gas. The obscene heat it generates in the kitchen alone is horrible for everyone working there.

[–] newde@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Induction is much, much faster.