this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
166 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

59427 readers
3782 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DuckWrangler9000@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (13 children)

The thing I really hate about AI is when they say it can make art. For centuries, art has been a form of expression and communicating all sorts of human emotions and experiences. Some art reflects pain or memories experienced in life. Other art is designed out of intellectual curiosity or to evoke thought. AI isn't human, so it can't do anything other than copy or simulate. It's artificial after all. So it makes images. But there's no backstory or feelings or emotion or suffering. It's truly meaningless.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 8 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Or, maybe, we have to accept that art and all the grandiose and deep narratives around it are bullshit. It's an illusion, it's just a tool so some of us feel more important.

All that crap about not being made by humans is just the fear that the illusion of grandeur of humans might collapse.

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Art is in the act of creating it. Not in the final product to be bought and sold on the market.

A kid coloring is making art. The joy they get in the making is the art and is the point.

I feel sorry for so many people in this thread who keep approaching this from the point of view of consumer markets. It doesn't matter if someone can determine an AI colored picture from a child's. The AI derives no joy in the creation. It's not art, but a copy.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Art is in the act of creating it.

This is just your opinion.

Not in the final product to be bought and sold on the market.

This isn't inevitable or necessary.

Personally I enjoy generated art (mostly scifi/fantasy) and I never pay for it.

On the other hand I try to support actual artists because they're most often struggling under capitalism much more than some person using midjourney or wahtever.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)