U.S. News

2244 readers

53 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rs5th@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

New guideline: Posts linking to stories with Nazi imagery need to be marked NSFW; please link to a source without such images if at all possible (it usually is) (beehaw.org)

submitted 10 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thankfully, this hasn't come up yet. This march in Ohio is probably going to be the smallest (10 people) but certainly won't be the last.

As we won't see the sort of blowback we did with Charlottesville this time around given the wildly different political landscape, this isn't a one-off.

After discussing with other site leaders, this feels like the best compromise. Such art can be triggering for some, but open Nazism in the U.S. can't just be ignored, and photos can be of more utility than text in some cases.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit : a suggestion: maybe a new tag could be implemented that separates pornography and other explicit content of the sort from nsfw because of graphic or disturbing content. (I know this would have to be done at the Dev level, maybe you folk could push that instead of what is happening)

First off, I like a variety of sources and instances, I like this one.

Now, it would seem your argument boils down to people can't take care of themselves. Can't use the tools available. And you are completely dismissive of my concerns. To suggest I don't care is .. Something.

I get people have triggers. That's why people use CW or Trigger Warning labels.

Making it NSFW outright blocks it from the majority of users feeds.

Sure, I'm a guest. We all are.

You're just making it less useful.

You are FORCING users to have to view other NSFW things in order to be informed when keyword filters would work for those that need them.

So, those triggered by porn etc will have to deal with that.

I don't see how this can work.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

It's ultimately an editorial decision made after consulting with admins. There's no evidence to suggest the new guideline will ever have to come into play, so claiming the community is already less useful is hyperbole. This is a prophylactic measure.