this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
451 points (96.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6788 readers
566 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 302 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Guy whose cars run into stopped fire trucks thinks he’s an expert on computer vision.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 107 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Someone died because one of those cars thought the broadside of a white semi trailer was the sky and drove under it

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I thought it mistook the semi that was crossing a divided highway as an overpass and attempted to drive under it?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

This is exactly how Ed Truck died. His capa was detated from his head.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But was it a "stealthy" fire truck??

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago

Yes, but the car only had enough low-light cameras but not enough rudimentary AI

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Speaking of fire trucks has anyone here ever read the emergency response procedures for teslas in severe accidents? When I was a volunteer we gave it a look over.

If I remember right, Depending on the model they recommend up to 8,000 gallons (~30k liters) to keep an overheating battery's temp stable in case of fire or exposure to high heat. I'll link the resource page here.

Our engine holds 700 gallons (5.2k liters) and the typical tanker in our area holds 2,000 (7.5k liters)

That's a house fire level response for a single electric vehicle. Just getting that much water moved to a scene would be challenging. We have tankers, but how many city departments can move that much water? You don't see hydrants on highways. And foam is not effective like it is for normal car fires. The future will be interesting for firefighters.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I found a link on how the Austrian fire workeres handle this. The fire is extinguished first, then the remainders of the car are put into a special roll-off container (Abrollbehälter, AB) and driven to a gravel pit, where the container will be flooded with 21000 litres of water.

https://www.feuerwehrmagazin.de/nachrichten/news/elektroauto-in-flammen-einsatz-fuer-den-abrollbehaelter-e-brand-93315

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's interesting. Tesla says the cars shouldn't be submerged but I wonder if there's any serious consequence if you did?

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

After this procedure, the car is irreparably damaged, if this was your question.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago

As far as safety. It is a big battery after all

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

30,000 liters is 30m^3, which is a back yard swimming pool full of water.

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Now imagine a house on fire with a tesla in the garage or multiple vehicle accidents. Now you need that much more

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 weeks ago

Now imagine having to use 30,000 litres of water for every Tesla/EV on fire while facing extreme drought conditions caused by global warming.

lookin at you Cali

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 weeks ago

It is especially important to understand that Tesla's struggles with navigation are entirely a result of Elon refusing to equip them with LiDAR. This isn't some "The tech is really new and really complicated and we're still figuring it out" problem. There is a very good solution to most collision avoidance scenarios, but Elon refuses to let them use it because he's an idiot.