this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
42 points (71.4% liked)
Asklemmy
44171 readers
1745 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m not into this line of thinking because by continuing to eat meat they’re still causing animal suffering. It isn’t a belief without consequences (like talking to the air is), it actually impacts others (the animals).
All beliefs and practices impact others, because they guide your behavior and your behavior impacts others. It's up to you whether you decide to bring your beliefs and practices into every conversation, but the person you're talking to is likely to think you're unpleasant to be around. This is especially true if you place your belief or practice in judgment of someone else's.
So sure, you can be vocal if that's what you want to do, but you're also likely to suffer social consequences, which is what OP is asking about avoiding.
Well I don’t want to generalize about every possible belief, but what I wrote is that by consuming meat you’re impacting animals’ lives so the argument that each person has a choice and it only impacts that person is false.
I’m not addressing every possible belief someone might hold.
This is kinda exemplifying it. It's one thing to raise awareness, but it's another to chastise someone's preferences for one of the main bodily functions necessary to live and try to make them uproot their entire lives around a philosophy. The fact of the matter is, barring a cataclysmic event, people are still going to eat what they enjoy. If you can convert someone to the cause, sweet, but if they say no, leave it be. You aren't going to shame someone into going vegan, and that he line makes someone a dick.
If eating meat is needed to live, and I haven’t eaten meat in 6+ years how am I alive?
Where did I say eating meet is needed to live? I said preference. Your reading comprehension and abrasion aren't winning you any points bud.
Annnd there it is folks, the vegan that has to assume moral superiority.
I said that eating dead animals impacts those animals’ lives, not just the person who chooses to eat meat. Where do you think meat comes from?
Nope, nope, nope, not playing your game, not gonna happen
The game where you make a huge assumption and then get pissy when a rather obvious counterpoint is made?
That’s fine with me, there are more productive conservations to be had; I don’t have time to go through 20 rationalizations and justifications anyway. 👋
Thank you for making my point
I'm not vegan so take it from me: you're being obtuse.