this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
135 points (69.0% liked)

Privacy

31934 readers
627 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] czech@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm not impressed with Kagi. I was lied to by someone at Kagi when I asked a question about their using geo-location data.

(Well, technically not lied to, but it was clear they were being deliberately evasive and deceptive, which didn't impress me much, since it's a paid service I was considering.)

Edit.

Obviously, my take may be biased, so I've added screenshots from the exchange I had with Kagi, but I've blotted out all names for privacy. Even though this left a bad taste in my mouth, I hope I'm not depicting this unfairly, so now you can decide for yourself.

Edit: If you're tempted to respond in bad faith, go annoy someone else. I'm not taking the bait, I'll just block your ass.

Edit Part 2: Why do all my comments attract the most insufferable neckbeards?

A. It's clear why I found it deceptive since he was being a pedant about what constitutes search results (if a widget is summoned by a search term -- which didn't request it btw -- then that widget is part of the results. It's batshit looney to think otherwise)

B. But I literally posted screenshots for full disclosure and for the sake of honesty -- and I'm still getting losers posting cringe in response. Fucking suburbanite straight white male energy stfu

C. Get blocked, fuckwits. If I wanted your opinion, I'd ask.

[–] 4vr@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which part of that replay was deceptive?

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legitimately, what part of that was deceptive? They outright stated that those specialized widgets you can't disable. Your post here is far more misleading in comparison.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do all my comments attract the most insufferable neckbeards?

A. It's clear why I found it deceptive since he was being a pedant about what constitutes search results (if a widget is summoned by a search term -- which didn't request it btw -- then that widget is part of the results. It's batshit looney to think otherwise)

B. But I literally posted screenshots for full disclosure and for the sake of honesty -- and I'm still getting losers posting cringe in response. Fucking suburbanite straight white male energy stfu

C. Get blocked, fuckwit. If I wanted your opinion, I'd ask.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the most insufferable neckbeards

https://lemmy.one/pictrs/image/b7ad3f91-d781-4085-9757-873ed7e6f4ee.jpeg

he was being a pedant about what constitutes search results

You mean they were being precisely accurate

Fucking suburbanite straight white male energy stfu

I'm not male

If I wanted your opinion, I’d ask

You posted to a public forum, but man you've really got an attitude about any contest to what you've said.

load more comments (3 replies)